Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Hart [2012] NZLCDT 20 [pdf, 455 KB]
...and “review”. 20 [82] Although Mr Hart does not specifically state in his evidence, it is likely that some of the review work (two and a half hours and 45 minutes respectively claimed on 12 December) is alleged to relate to the checking of Ms Thode’s document which she had prepared using precedents available to her in Mr Hart’s office. Although Ms Thode’s evidence is that she is not aware of Mr Hart checking her work and certainly did not personally spend time...