Search Results

1. RS v NC LCRO 70/2011 (17 April 2013) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...information provided by the Applicant was copied and returned to the Applicant at the firm’s expense. [39] The Practitioner noted that the request for information was in fact sought by Mr AS (reference was made to Mr AS’s letter of complaint to the Privacy Commissioner). The Practitioner confirmed that information that was available online (pertaining to the [Iwi X] settlement) was not provided, as it was publicly available. The Practitioner did not consider this pertained d...

2. Form1 Criminal legal aid application Crown Prosecution [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...home. No Yes Give details below Main vehicle for personal use Make and Model Year Registration Number Market value Money owing $ $ Other vehicle $ $ Other vehicle $ $ Templates V11 – July 2017 page 8 Privacy statement: Money & investments 45. Do you have any money or investments? No Yes Give details below DO NOT include equity in a business or trust - we will work out this amount for you based on the set of accounts you...

3. Form 1 Crown Prosecution [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...home. No Yes Give details below Main vehicle for personal use Make and Model Year Registration Number Market value Money owing $ $ Other vehicle $ $ Other vehicle $ $ Templates V12 – August 2017 page 8 Privacy statement: Money & investments 45. Do you have any money or investments? No Yes Give details below DO NOT include equity in a business or trust - we will work out this amount for you based on the set of accounts y...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 142 Leota v The CE of the Ministry of Social Development [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...kidneys. Mr Macdonald, advocate for Mr Leota, claimed that the provisions in the collective agreement, which the defendant was relying upon, did not apply unless medical retirement was being considered. He also asserted that there had been a privacy breach as a result of the Team Leader informing the Residence Manager of Mr Leota’s kidney problems. It was also at this meeting that Mr Macdonald informed the Residence Manager and the Human Resources Consultant that Mr Leo...

5. AMLCFT Statutory Review Summary Document [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...challenges with identifying customers. We are interested in knowing what challenges or barriers you have identified regarding adopting or harnessing technology. Furthermore, we would like to hear your views of the adoption of digital identity services. Privacy and protection of information (page 104) Businesses are required to collect a large amount of personal information from their customers, particularly where the risks are high. We want to ensure that the Act properly protects peo...

6. MOJ0048.7M-DEC22-Maori-translated-final-corrected-file-PRINT.pdf [pdf, 450 KB]

   ...whai ake nei ki ngā pārurenga anake o te taihara kua kōrerotia ki ngā Pirihimana, kei mua o te kōti rānei. He wāhi ēnei motika o te Ture Mana Pārurenga 2002. Ka whai motika hoki ngā pārurenga i raro i ērā atu ture, pērā i te Privacy Act 2020, te Bill of Rights Act 1990, te Sentencing Act 2002, te Bail Act 2000, me te Children, Young Persons, and Their Families (Oranga Tamariki) Legislation Act 2017. Ka pā ki a wai ēnei motika? Ka pā ngā Motika 1–6 ki...

7. Frequently asked questions

   ...to receive my criminal record check results? We endeavour to respond to all requests within 20 working days. Around 90% of requests are responded to in less than one week. However, some requests will need to be assessed by a staff member to ensure the privacy of the individual is protected. We may also need to contact you for more information in order to process your request. In these cases, it may take longer to receive your results. What form of identification do I need to provide when submit...

   Located in:

   1. Criminal record check

8. NZCVS Methodology Report Cycle 1 (2018) [pdf, 5 MB]

   ...benefit of the interviewer being able to control the survey process. They are experienced with the survey questions and software, and can use techniques such as probing to verify responses. The main drawback is that it does not afford the respondent privacy when answering sensitive questions. Administering questions by CASI tends to elicit more honest responses to sensitive questions, and affords better protection of the respondent’s privacy, however the burden on the respondent is incre...

9. AQ v UD LCRO 188/2013 (10 August 2013) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...consideration, and to some limited extent this has occurred in this case. Mrs AQ has, in the process of providing further information, expanded the scope of her complaint to include issues involving a request for legal files that she made under the Privacy Act 1993. This matter was not part of the original complaint. Mrs AQ filed a complaint with the Officer of the Privacy Commissioner in relation to that matter. It would be inappropriate for me to deal with the additional issue...

10. LCRO 243/2016 KE v HO (21 June 2019) [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...Allegations should not be made against persons not involved in the proceeding unless they are necessary to the conduct of the litigation and reasonable steps are taken to ensure the accuracy of the allegations and, where appropriate, the protection of the privacy of those persons. [41] Mr HO’s position is that while she was engaged in litigation, acting for Ms YS/Ms CB, Mrs KE attacked his reputation without good cause in documents filed in court proceedings. Mr HO’s complaint is...