Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 118 Drach v Tasman District Council [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...TIUvIP's anticipated landscape outcomes. It would "sit comfortably within the surrounding environment" and have "minimal impact on the overall visual amenity and character of the landscape"; (e) rural residential levels of privacy would be maintained for the Drachs and their views of Tasman Bay, Rabbit Island, Nelson City and the mountains would not be materially impacted. [39] Cross-examination did not significantly challenge those op1n1ons. \Ve accept them....

2. Local Government Bill [pdf, 440 KB]

   ...and administrative difficulties in requiring the police to obtain a search warrant in each case. 75. In addition, in considering whether the proposed search power is reasonable in terms of section 21, we have balanced individuals’ expectations of privacy against the safety, rights and interests of other people using the public space. The proposed search power aims to ensure that people do not possess or consume alcohol in a public place in order to achieve a safe and orderly environmen...

3. 26.-Evidence-of-Ms-Jo-Healy-Social-Impacts.PDF [PDF, 352 KB]

   ...Kāinga Ora. Relying on the information provided to date from the Kāinga Ora submission, and subsequent engagement between Waka Kotahi with Kainga Ora (including a site visit), I understand that the potential social impact concerns relate to privacy, potential disruption of daily activities and increased stress due to change of environment and potential disturbance during construction and operation. 66. In my opinion while there is an element of environmental change (from a rura...

4. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Mr K [2024] NZLCDT 18 (3 July 2024) [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...(“outrageous and insulting communications”18) fell on the personal side of the divide. It distinguished the circumstances from Young because Mr U was conducting his own case in relation to private and intimate matters in the Family Court; the privacy of that forum prevented damage to the reputation of the profession; accordingly, there was no public protective purpose; and the Tribunal saw no risk that the conduct might translate to incompetent practice for members of the publi...

5. Strengthening Consequences for Crime in the Crimes Act 1961 [pdf, 541 KB]

   ...following agencies were consulted on this paper: Crown Law Office, Department of Corrections, Customs, Ministry of Social Development, Ministry of Disabled People, Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment, New Zealand Police, Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Ministry for Women, Te Puni Kōkiri, Ministry for Pacific Peoples, Treasury, Ministry of Health, Ministry for Regulation, Te Puna Aonui, and Oranga Tamariki. 75 The Parliamentary Counsel Office and the Department of the Pri...

6. AML/CFT Statutory Review - summary of form submissions [pdf, 820 KB]

   ...comments below. 36 Question 1.30: Should the FIU be able to request information from businesses on an ongoing basis? 36 Q1.31multi 36 Please explain your answer 36 Question 1.31: If the FIU had this power, what constraints are necessary to ensure that privacy and human rights are adequately protected? 36 What constraints are needed? 36 Question 1.32: Should the Act provide the FIU with a power to freeze, on a time limited basis, funds or transactions in order to prevent harm and victim...

7. CA v XU LCRO 196 / 2010 (18 May 2011) - Publication Decision [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...protection to the public including consumers of legal and conveyancing services; 2. the extent to which publication will enhance public confidence in the provision of legal and conveyancing services; 3. the impact of publication on the interests and privacy of – 3 (a) the complainant; (b) the practitioner; (c) any other person. 4. the seriousness of any professional breaches. 5. whether the practitioner has previously been found to have breached professional standards....

8. BORA Coroners Bill [pdf, 21 KB]

   ...determined to have been self-inflicted only limited details can be published without the Coroner's permission. In the circumstances that the Coroner is able to grant permission to publish such details and given the interests of protecting the privacy of persons connected with the deceased such prior restraint on publication is a justifiable limit upon freedom of expression. 4.3 Clause 64 enables a coroner to prohibit publication of any evidence given at any part of the proceedings o...

9. BORA Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Amendment Bill [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...(i.e. the Tribunal may exercise this power in relation to an adjudication or the parties to it) and that the power must be exercised reasonably. Also, the power to demand the production of documents is less of an intrusion into the expectation of privacy than a power of entry.[3] Section 27(1): Consistency with the Right to Natural Justice 8. Section 27(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that every person whose interests are affected by a decision by a public authority has the right t...

10. BORA Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Relationships Registration Amendment Bill [pdf, 370 KB]

    ...Bill introduces a new framework that limits access to registered information (for example birth information, death information, marriage information, civil union information and name change information), with the purpose of incorporating appropriate privacy safeguards. We have considered whether these provisions infringe the right to freedom of expression, which is expressed to include the right to seek and receive information. 6. Given these express references, it might be suggested that...