Search Results

1. WA v AD LCRO 132/2012 (18 March 2015) [pdf, 37 KB]

   ...orders, and applied for a review. Review Application [11] Ms WA’s application for review reiterated her original complaints, updated her compensation claim and included further submissions and documentation. She sought remedies for breaches of privacy, over which this Office has no jurisdiction, again emphasising the content of the memorandum about which the Committee had already recorded a disciplinary finding. In essence, Ms WA believes Ms AD should be penalised far more har...

2. LCRO 16/2018 AD v LN [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...was not provided to the Committee and has not been provided on review. The terms of the Deed are private matters between its signatories, none of whom are parties to Mr AD’s complaint. There is no proper basis for this Office to disregard the privacy interests of those non-parties by requiring production of the Deed. Suffice to 6 say, it appears from the title on the Land Register that at least some of the arrangements recorded in the Deed were put into effect. [26] It seem...

3. BORA Credit Contracts and Financial Services Law Reform Bill [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...of the Bill of Rights Act. However, we do not consider the search power unreasonable in terms of s 21 for the following reasons: • The search power does not involve a physical search to a person or of property, so the intrusion into a person’s privacy is at the lower end of the scale. • There are clearly defined limits to the search. In particular, the search only relates to documentation, and the provisions clearly specify the nature of the information for which the Registrar ca...

4. Anonymised [2017] NZREADT 38 [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...suppression the Tribunal must balance the need for open justice against an agent’s own circumstances. Section 108 provides that if the Tribunal “considers it is proper to do so, having regard to the interests of any person 6 including the privacy of the complainant and the public interest, it may make an order, inter alia, prohibiting publication of the name and affairs of the person”. [18] In Erceg v Erceg [2016] NZSC 135 the Supreme Court reinforced the well- establ...

5. [2018] NZEmpC 75 Rachelle v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...statement of claim in this challenge pleaded several causes of action against Air NZ as follows: (a) workplace discrimination; (b) harassment and bullying within the workplace; (c) breaches of 12 workplace codes and conducts; (d) breaches of privacy law act within the workplace; (e) unlawful dismissal; 5 At [39]. (f) several breaches of policies and procedures; (g) defamation of character; and (h) sexual harassment....

6. Family Court rewrite submission: Blind Citizens NZ [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...regardless of what this might be. Experiences shared by people from our community inform our submission. Where possible, we outline what needs to happen to enable blind people to experience the same rights as non-disabled people. The same rights to privacy, dignity, and confidentiality, when exposed to the Justice System and dealing with information, and the same rights to participate fully in society as independent and equal citizens. Court documentation and processes...

7. Waitangi Tribunal COVID-19 Level 2 protocol (3 September 2020) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...personal responsibility for their own health and wellbeing – including washing hands regularly, following hygiene practices and, if unwell, following Ministry of Health guidance. k. Leaving doors open where consistent with security, fire safety, privacy and noise reduction. 26. Safe distancing will be observed in Tribunal hearing venues, and the following hygiene practices can be expected: a. Those working in the venue, including counsel, are required to maintain 1m social distan...

8. Waitangi Tribunal COVID-19 Level 2 Protocol (3 September 2020) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...personal responsibility for their own health and wellbeing – including washing hands regularly, following hygiene practices and, if unwell, following Ministry of Health guidance. k. Leaving doors open where consistent with security, fire safety, privacy and noise reduction. 26. Safe distancing will be observed in Tribunal hearing venues, and the following hygiene practices can be expected: a. Those working in the venue, including counsel, are required to maintain 1m social distan...

9. ARLA PNG 1 [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...normal postal or courier services within five working days of the decision being issued. Until such time as committee secretaries are otherwise advised, the electronic transmission of these documents to the licensing authority is not acceptable due to privacy concerns related to the security of emails used to transfer documents. 2. REFERRAL OF APPLICATIONS TO THE LICENSING AUTHORITY 2.1 Section 104(2) and (3) of the Act provides: 104 Who decides application for licence (2) With the...

10. BORA Resource Management Amendment Bill Vet [pdf, 215 KB]

    ...Section 21 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure, whether of the person, property, correspondence or otherwise. The right protects a number of values including personal privacy, dignity, and property.4 17. Clause 67 inserts new sections 343E-343L, which set out new enforcement functions for the EPA. Section 343F authorises the EPA to take an enforcement action either unilaterally or in partnership with a loc...