Search Results

1. LEG-Paper-Rules-Committee-Matariki-Amendment-Rules-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 959 KB]

   ...comply with each of the following: 8.1. the principles of te Tiriti o Waitangi; 8.2. the rights and freedoms contained in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the Human Rights Act 1993; 8.3. the principles and guidelines set out in the Privacy Act 2020; 8.4. relevant international standards and obligations; and 8.5. the Legislation Guidelines (2021 edition), which are maintained by the Legislation Design and Advisory Committee. 9. This set of Amendment Rules follows the...

2. [2023] NZEmpC 67 Bennett v Goldie [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...Court’s website for 28 days from the date of the judgment to allow Mr Bennett to consider the judgment. [26] Mr Bennett has provided detailed health information to explain his inaction on Ms Goldie’s case. I accept that there are significant privacy issues involved. I also see no wider public interest in the health information being published beyond what is contained in this judgment and in the Authority’s determination. [27] Accordingly, I make an order that the inform...

3. XD v KA [2023] NZDT 348 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...belong to him (ie to BX). However, it is not clear to me why he did not disclose this to the Tribunal from the outset. 14. BX did not wish to disclose his address or any information about himself or KA. While I understand his wish to maintain privacy, his unwillingness to provide information to the Tribunal has made it difficult to fully understand his involvement in the transaction. 15. XD sent in the text conversations he had regarding the purchase of the fish. Those conversati...

4. Proactive-Release-Electoral-Expenditure-Limit-Order-2024_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...Order complies with the following: 9.1 the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi; 9.2 the rights and freedoms contained in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the Human Rights Act 1993; 9.3 the principles and guidelines set out in the Privacy Act 2020; 9.4 relevant international standards and obligations; and 9.5 the Legislation Guidelines. Regulations Review Committee 10 There are no grounds on which the Regulations Review Committee should draw the Order to the speci...

5. OIA-120501.pdf [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...December 2024. However, the additional information you requested about this reparation, such as what the reparation is for, how much has been paid and what the term of the payments are, is withheld under section 9(2)(a) of the Act, to protect the privacy of natural persons. In response to parts 6 and 7 of your request, please find attached the only document which falls within the scope of your request. Some information within this document has been withheld as it is out of scope of your...

6. Proactive-Release_GR-to-the-JCR-Inquiry-into-the-2023-General-Election.FINAL.pdf [pdf, 474 KB]

   ...Law, the Public Service Commission, Te Puni Kōkiri, the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha, Ministry for Culture and Heritage, Ministry for Ethnic Communities, Ministry for Pacific Peoples, Ministry for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Ministry for Primary Industries, Ministry of Youth Development, and Office for Seniors have been consulted on this paper. The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (Policy Advisory Group) has been informed. Fina...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 263 North Canterbury Fish & Game Council v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...(d) the freedom to seek, receive and impart information.9 [12] When considering requests for access to documents that are not part of the formal court records, it is essential to strike a balance between ensuring open justice and protecting the privacy interests of the parties involved. [13] The court is satisfied that disclosing the documents sought by Mr Williams is appropriate in principle, however it is not appropriate to do so at this stage in the proceeding. I have considered...

8. Re Dunstan (Rejection of Statements of Claim No. 4) [2024] NZHRRT 67 [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...and limited to the criteria set out in s 92B of the HRA, this cannot be extended by this regulation. [10] The remainder of Ms Dunstan’s submissions, set out a range of concerns she has regarding the conduct of the Tribunal, the HRC and the Privacy Commissioner, but do not engage with the specific jurisdictional concerns the Tribunal outlined in its Minute dated 9 April 2024. No additional documents or amended claim forms were attached. [11] On 28 August 2024, the Chairperson i...

9. Questions and answers

   ...applications in strict confidence. No part of the process will take place in public. The names of applicants, and the outcomes of applications, will not be published. Information held by the Ministry is subject to the Official Information Act 1982 and the Privacy Act 1993. The Ministry appreciates that applications contain personal information about highly sensitive and private matters. Unless required otherwise by law, the Ministry does not expect to make public details about an application. S...

   Located in:

   1. Criminal record check >
   2. Wiping historical homosexual convictions

10. [2025] NZEmpC 62 (TradeZone Industrial Group Ltd v Stanton [pdf, 171 KB]

    ...acknowledged that Mr Stanton had admitted his conduct, repaid TradeZone its substantive claim in full and handed himself in to the Police.5 [7] Mr Stanton applied for non-publication orders on the grounds that publication would adversely affect his privacy, his rehabilitation and reintegration into society, and his family, who he says will suffer undue hardship and emotional distress due to his offending. He relies on his taking accountability for his conduct, his proactive steps...