Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal COVID-19 Level 2 Protocol (7 September 2021) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...personal responsibility for their own health and wellbeing – including washing hands regularly, following hygiene practices and, if unwell, following Ministry of Health guidance. k. Leaving doors open where consistent with security, fire safety, privacy and noise reduction. 27. Safe distancing will be observed in Tribunal hearing venues, and the following hygiene practices can be expected: a. Those working in the venue, including counsel, are required to maintain appropri...

2. Maori Land Court COVID-19 Level 2 protocol 7 September 202 [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...personal responsibility for their own health and wellbeing – including washing hands regularly, following hygiene practices and, if unwell, following Ministry of Health guidance. k. Leaving doors open where consistent with security, fire safety, privacy and noise reduction. 20. Parties should arrive at Court at the time that their matter is scheduled for hearing and vacate the courtroom once their hearing has concluded. 21. Safe distancing will be observed in the courtr...

3. [2021] NZEmpC 127 AlKazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...Business Innovation and Employment.3 [3] Subsequently, Mr AlKazaz brought proceedings in the Authority alleging breaches of that settlement agreement and seeking compliance orders and penalties. Penalties were also sought for alleged breaches of the Privacy Act 1993 and the Human Rights Act 1993. In addition, claims for unjustifiable disadvantage and unjustified dismissal were raised. Mr AlKazaz was wholly unsuccessful and has challenged the decision in the Court. [4] The matt...

4. National Standards Committee 2 v Mr Y [2023] NZLCDT 1 (12 January 2023) [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...Standards Committee 1 of the New Zealand Law Society [2013] NZHC 2090. 14 Section 240(1) LCA: “If the Disciplinary Tribunal is of the opinion that it is proper to do so, having regard to the interest of any person (including (without limitation) the privacy of the complainant (if any)) and to the public interest, it may make……(c) an order prohibiting the publication of the name or any particulars of the affairs of the person charged or any other person…” Emphasis added....

5. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v Holdaway [2022] NZLCDT 49 (22 December 2022) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...convince us. Her view that anti-money laundering checks would take between six to eight weeks in this case (where the client had formerly had funds with the same wealth management firm) made no sense. Ms Holdaway’s fear that, in some way, her own privacy would be at risk because of her trustee status seemed unfounded. In the meantime, the client’s instructions were varied but Ms Holdaway, when she finally acted, followed the prior instruction, not the later instruction. [8] M...

6. Criminal-Legal-Aid-Application-Form3.pdf [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...information may be used for statistical and/or research purposes and in this context will not individually identify you » you have the right to have access to all information held about you, and to request correction of that information under the Privacy Act 2020 » we will assess your �nancial means and you may be required to repay some or all of your legal aid. Any assets or property that you own may be subject to a charge to cover some or the entire repayment amount » intere...

7. [2022] NZACC 6 – Jones v ACC (19 January 2022) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...Review Tribunal in Vivash.3 The Court determined that the Vivash decision had no application to the present proceeding, as the Human Rights Review Tribunal was exercising a different jurisdiction and applying legislation from another Act, the Privacy Act 1993. The Court did not consider that any special reason had been established which necessitated the granting of the application for recall of the Authority’s decision under the third category. Relevant law [16] The present...

8. Intelligence and Security Act 2017 Review - Engagement report [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...Zealanders over non-New Zealanders tended to indicate either: • that risks to national security come from overseas and domestically, so it is important to protect New Zealanders as well as non-New Zealanders; or • human rights and the right to privacy are universal, regardless of national origin. 21. Forty-two participants thought they would feel more protected, and an equal 42 participants thought they would feel less protected if the NZSIS and GCSB collected information that...

9. Intelligence and Security Act 2017 Review Engagement report [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...Zealanders over non-New Zealanders tended to indicate either: • that risks to national security come from overseas and domestically, so it is important to protect New Zealanders as well as non-New Zealanders; or • human rights and the right to privacy are universal, regardless of national origin. 21. Forty-two participants thought they would feel more protected, and an equal 42 participants thought they would feel less protected if the NZSIS and GCSB collected information that...

10. DF v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 177 (19 April 2023) [pdf, 143 KB]

    ...chattels list was very comprehensive and contained over 600 items, many of which could not reasonably be accounted for at each inspection. A property manager cannot reasonably look in every cupboard and draw without risk of interfering with a tenant’s privacy. In addition, trying to account fully for every item on the chattels list is not reasonably possible given that tenants also had their own belongings and furniture in the premises. 12. Therefore I have not allowed DF claims for...