Search Results

1. Tatana v Matthews - General Land Lot A DP 83617 (2023) 471 Aotea MB 209 (471 AOT 209) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...adopted for Hautonga Reserve. It confirms Hautonga Reserve as “a place for the Tatana whānau to return from time to time, to release pressure and stress from their survival activities throughout the working year and to appreciate the sanctity, privacy, spirituality of their whole well-being and peace of mind”. Relevantly, clause 6 of the charter speaks to the revocation of the Māori reservation status over Hautonga Reserve. It provides that the beneficial owners of Hautonga...

2. NZBORA-Advice-Fair-Digital-News-Bargaining-Bill-for-publication.pdf [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure, whether of the person, property, correspondence or otherwise. The right protects an amalgam of values including property, personal freedom, privacy and dignity.13 17. There are two limbs to the s 21 right. First, the section is applicable only in respect of activities that constitute a search or seizure. Secondly, it protects only against those searches or seizures that are “unr...

3. Better-outcomes-for-Victims-approvals-for-introducing-family-violence-legislation.pdf [pdf, 380 KB]

   ...policy proposals [SWC-23-MIN-0020 refers]. Compliance 15. The Bill complies with: a. the disclosure statement requirements (a disclosure statement prepared by the Ministry of Justice is attached), b. the principles and guidelines set out in the Privacy Act 2020, c. relevant international standards and obligations, and d. the Legislation Guidelines (2021 edition), which are maintained by the Legislation Design and Advisory Committee. New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 16. Th...

4. Criminal legal aid application form CPIP only 2024 [pdf, 799 KB]

   ...information may be used for statistical and/or research purposes and in this context will not individually identify you » you have the right to have access to all information held about you, and to request correction of that information under the Privacy Act 2020 » we will assess your financial means and you may be required to repay some or all of your legal aid. Any assets or property that you own may be subject to a charge to cover some or the entire repayment amount » if you receive...

5. BS v KC & DC [2024] NZDT 721 (9 September 2024) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...granted by the Council. BS says that this means that even if it is correct that only a 1.5m fence is permitted without consent, then now that he has consent I can and should order a 2m high fence be built on the boundary. He says this is required for privacy and to contain a dog he plans to buy soon. 13. KC and DC say that such an order would be unfair because it would effectively allow BS to have a second go at achieving the fence he wants, having been unhappy with my original order....

6. TS v SQ Ltd [2024] NZDT 538 (10 July 2024) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...have read and agree to the fare rules applicable to this booking (including whether the fare is refundable and any applicable cancellation policies). “I have read and agree to all terms and conditions of this transaction including SQ Ltd’s Privacy Policy and Refund Policy. I acknowledge and agree that SQ Ltd is unable to refund my payment for my travel product unless and until the airline or other travel product suppliers refunds the payment to SQ Ltd. I acknowledge and agree that...

7. [2025] NZIACDT 12 - XI v Liu (18 February 2025) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...[37] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.9 It must balance the public’s interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and knowing the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. [38] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Mr Liu’s client. [39] The Tribunal orders that no information identifying the complainant is to be published other than to Immigration NZ. __________...

8. [2025] NZIACDT 13 – HG v Liu (18 February 2025) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...[37] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.9 It must balance the public’s interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and knowing the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. [38] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Mr Liu’s client. [39] The Tribunal orders that no information identifying the complainant is to be published other than to Immigration NZ. __________...

9. [2025] NZIACDT 38 – LY v Jiang (30 July 2025) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...[40] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.9 It must balance the public’s interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and also of the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. [41] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Mr Jiang’s client. [42] The Tribunal orders publication of the decision, but that no information identifying the complainant is to be published other than to...

10. [2025] NZIACDT 43 – BL v Schoeller (27 August 2025) [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...SUPPRESSION [40] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.7 It must balance the public’s interest in knowing the Tribunal’s jurisprudence and wrongdoing by advisers, with the privacy of individuals. [41] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Ms Schoeller’s client. [42] The Tribunal directs publication of the decision, but orders that no information identifying the complainant is to be published...