Search Results

1. WB v Stevenson LCRO 301/2013 (11 December 2014) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...When deciding whether to publish the identity of a person who is the subject of a censure order, a Standards Committee and the Board2 must take into account the public interest and, if appropriate, the impact of publication on the interests and privacy of— (a) the complainant; and (b) clients of the censured person; and (c) relatives of the censured person; and (d) partners, employers, and associates of the censured person; and (e) the censured person. [4] The proper app...

2. Family Court rewrite submission: RNZA College of Psychiatrists [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...redevelopment of the family justice system must recognise the importance of:  meeting the contemporary needs of whānau/families and individuals  protecting the safety of individuals, particularly children  affording dignity and privacy to separating families  timely and cost-effective resolution of family disputes  protecting the needs of children  child-centred and trauma-informed approaches  equality of treatment for children regardless of family...

3. Application for family or civil legal aid form [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   ...This information may be used for statistical and/or research purposes and in this context will not individually identify you. You have the right to have access to all information held about you, and to request correction of that information under the Privacy Act 2020. We will assess your financial means and as a result you may be required to repay some or all of your legal aid. Any assets or property that you own may be subject to a charge to cover some or the entire repayment amount, inclu...

4. Proactive Release - Report on overseas travel (United Kingdom - July-August 2019) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...need to modernise border security systems to deal with evolving threats. We therefore commit to pursue expanded data sharing prior to and at the border to facilitate the secure movement of legitimate travellers and goods and in ways that maintain privacy, data security, and are consistent with domestic law. 3. We reiterate the sovereign right of states to strong border management, including the responsibility to deter, prevent, detect, and disrupt those who seek to evade or facilitate th...

5. COVID 19 Justice Sector Survey Report 10 Comparison of the Alert Levels results [pdf, 902 KB]

   ...contacted each week aiming to achieve approximately 300 finalised interviews (the response rate during the last week of interviewing was 82%). The average length of an interview is about 12 minutes. The survey follows the NZCVS strict approach to privacy and confidentiality and no contact details of interviewed adults are released. June 29, 2020 Sector Group Research and Evaluation Unit

6. [2022] NZEmpC 74 AlKazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...could apply for leave to extend time to file a challenge and so was proceeding along an incorrect route. The key actions that Mr AlKazaz took in this matter from April 2018 were: (a) In April 2018 Mr AlKazaz became aware that he could make Privacy Act requests and started doing so, initially to Enterprise IT. From May 2018, he made a series of requests to Air New Zealand and he obtained certain documentation. Air New Zealand was a client of Enterprise IT for whom Mr AlKazaz...

7. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v Holdaway [2022] NZLCDT 34 (22 September 2022) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...approximately $35,000 to L for renovations, Ms Holdaway did not pay out the other funds. At the hearing, Ms Holdaway suggested anti-money laundering checks could take six to eight weeks6 and this was an impediment. She seemed to think her own privacy would be breached7 by complying with anti-money laundering requirements. We find these propositions puzzling and concerning. When L instructed her in writing on 27 November and again on 1 December 2020 to pay the funds into L’s ow...

8. [2023] NZIACDT 7 - EQ v McCarthy (20 March 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...of any witness not be published.8 [37] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Mr McCarthy’s client, the complainant. Certain medical information concerning Mr McCarthy will also be redacted in the public decision to protect his privacy. 8 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 50A. 10 [38] The Tribunal orders that no information identifying the complainant is to be published other than to Immigration NZ. ___________________ D J Plunkett Chair...

9. BO & CO v MI [2022] NZDT 1 (14 February 2022) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...as this, with the properties being in the nature of lifestyle blocks, a boundary fence serves the purpose of demarcating the boundary and retaining animals, such as chickens, goats and other stock. A rural fence does not seek to achieve security, privacy and the ability to contain young children and larger dogs, in the way that suburban closed boarded fences might. The resource consent for the subdivision was granted on the condition that fencing be in keeping with rural fencing types a...

10. 2022-02-14-Minute-re-Media-Applications-+-Mr-Tarrants-Participation.pdf [pdf, 250 KB]

    ...stress or anxiety to the [Interested Party]; 1 Guideline 4. 2 Guideline 2(3). 4 (e) Whether being filmed, photographed or recorded may lead to intimidation or harassment of the [Interested Party]; (f) Whether the [Interested Party’s] privacy interests outweigh the public in publishing or using the [Interested Party’s submissions], given the likely significance of the [submissions] and (g) Any other matters the Judge or judicial officer considers relevant. [11] The mani...