Search Results

1. EMPC - Pro bono assistance service application [pdf, 296 KB]

   ...Service at least 24 hours in advance if you are unable to attend a scheduled appointment. The Service has the right to terminate its provision of assistance to you if you are unable to attend an appointment and provide inadequate notice to us. Privacy 10. The Service agrees to treat your personal information in accordance with its Privacy Policy attached to these terms and conditions. By making an application and receiving assistance from the Service you agree to the terms of the Priv...

2. Privacy Guidelines for providers of Justice services

   These guidelines set out the Ministry's privacy and information management expectations of providers. They help providers comply with the Privacy Act 2020. About the Privacy Guidelines Privacy guidelines factsheet Provider FAQs Guidelines and templates for providers Privacy Guidelines - guidelines for providers of Justice services Appendix Two - Data security self-assessment Appendix Three - Conflict of interest form...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers >
   3. Service providers

3. Director of Human Rights Proceedings [Lightbody] v Corrections (Joinder of Second Defendant No. 2) [2018] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 167 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 54 Reference No. HRRT 036/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS (in respect to BENJAMIN LIGHTBODY) PLAINTIFF AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FIRST DEFENDANT AND SERCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED SECOND DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Mr BK Neeson JP...

4. Re Dunstan (Rejection of Statement of Claim No. 3) [2024] NZHRRT 66 [pdf, 141 KB]

   1 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 IN THE MATTER OF AN INTENDED PROCEEDING BY TANYA DUNSTAN AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms SJ Eyre, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Ms T Dunstan, in person The intended defendant was not heard DATE OF DECISION: 12 December 2024 DECISION OF CHAIRPERSON REJECTING INTENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM1 [1] In August 2023, Ms Dunstan presented a statement of claim for filing in the Tribunal against Dream Au Pairs, alleging int...

5. BORA Enhancing Identity Verification and Border Processes Legislation Bill [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...risks, particularly those arising from confusion about criminal identities.”1 3. When Parliament gives an agency authority to demand, from another agency or person, information in which the subject of the information has a reasonable expectation of privacy, it creates a search power. The enactment creating that power will be consistent with s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act if the intrusion into privacy it authorises is justified by a sufficiently compelling public interest 2 4. We...

6. Tan v New Zealand Police [2016] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...PARTIES (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2016] NZHRRT 32 Reference No. HRRT 056/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN WENDY TAN PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr JAG Fountain, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms W Tan in person...

7. Re Dunstan (Rejection of Statement of Claim) [2023] NZHRRT 34 [pdf, 184 KB]

   1 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 IN THE MATTER OF INTENDED PROCEEDINGS BY TANYA DUNSTAN AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms Sarah Eyre, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Ms Dunstan, in person The intended defendant was not heard DATE OF DECISION: 13 October 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL THAT INTENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR FILING1 [1] On 19 April 2023, Ms Dunstan presented for filing in the Tribunal a statement of claim (on the official cla...

8. Appeal against compliance notice - Reply (s131) [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...sections below: Appellant’s name ________________________________________________________________________ First Middle Surname Step 1. Respondent – Privacy Commissioner Legal representative acting on behalf of the Privacy Commissioner _______________________________________________________________ Phone or mobile ____________________________________________________________________...

9. MacMillan v NZ Parole Board [2013] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 61 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 3 Reference No. HRRT 004/2012 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN ANDREW RONALD MACMILLAN PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND PAROLE BOARD DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr AR MacMillan in person Ms VJ Owen for Defendant DATE OF DECISION: 31 January 2013 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT ST...

10. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Valli and Hughes [2014] NZHRRT 58 [pdf, 333 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 58 Reference No. HRRT 019/2014 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND KYLIE MARIE VALLI FIRST DEFENDANT AND HADLEIGH HUGHES (ALSO KNOWN AS HADLEIGH GASS-HUGHES) SECOND DEFENDANT AT INVERCARGILL BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Hon KL Shirley, Member Ms M Sinclair, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms JV Eme...