Search Results

1. KH v ED [2018] NZDT 1434 (20 September 2018) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...the ones that have not been cut. 8. The trees are Cryptomeria trees commonly known as Japanese cedar. 9. ED says there are no amenity value in the trees and therefore no financial loss. KH says the trees were a shelter belt which provided privacy and were meant to be 5 to 6 metres high. He is now left with about half it being around a short metre hedge. He also says the trees shields his property from dust coming off ED’s gravel driveway and also provided shade for his livestock....

2. Chief Victims Advisor to Government Briefing for the Incoming Minister of Justice November 2020 [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...Leadership Board, Deputy Chief Executives, as well as the JVBU and other ministries and regulatory bodies • NGOs, independent victim advocates, and victim focussed academics • independent Commissions and Commissioners such as the Ombudsman, Privacy Commissioner, the Independent Police Conduct Authority, the Human Rights Commission, the Children’s Commission, and Health and Disabilities Commission • the legal profession • the judiciary • international victim experts...

3. CLC-National-Performance-Standards-1-July-2016.pdf [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...place that identify the care, support parameters, ethical and professional boundaries of all staff members and volunteers. The policies will include (and are not limited to): a) code of ethical behaviour and client rights; b) confidentiality and privacy; c) conflict of interest; and d) the levying of fees and charges. 22.2 All statutory and professional obligations are met including: a) the New Zealand Law Society Rules of Conduct and Client Care; 15 b) the requiremen...

4. KC v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 37 (23 February 2024) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...filed four “Submission” documents containing various documentary evidence incorporating redactions and comments by KC, comment and criticisms of the Judge’s reasoning and analysis of the evidence, and three affidavits. her reputation and privacy and humiliation through “leaking” of her sensitive health information everywhere. [23] The applicant submits that the Judge made mistakes of law and fact which are very serious and that the Judge did not properly apply the law rel...

5. [2024] NZREADT 27 - BL & DL v REAA (20 August 2024) [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...116, setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. PUBLICATION [57] Having regard to the interests of the public in knowing of any professional wrongdoing of licensees and also the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, balancing that against the privacy of the individuals involved, it is appropriate to order publication of the decision without naming the agency or any person. ___________________ C Sandelin Deputy Chairperson ___________________ N O’Connor Member...

6. MA v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2024] NZACC 117 (17 July 2024) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...meaningful account of his present condition. He may wish to consider obtaining a referral from his GP for a new whole person impairment assessment to be conducted in the future. Suppression I consider it is necessary and appropriate to protect the privacy of the appellant. This order, made under s 160(1) of the Accident Compensation Act 2001, forbids publication of the name, address, occupation, or particulars likely to lead to the identification of the appellant. As a result,...

7. [2024] NZIACDT 20 – LB v Luv (8 July 2024) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...within one month. ORDER FOR SUPPRESSION [44] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.12 This requires balancing the public interest in the transparency of the Tribunal with the privacy of individuals. 12 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50A. 11 [45] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Ms Luv’s client. [46] The Tribunal orders that no information identifying the complainant is to b...

8. [2024] NZIACDT 21 KL v Lawlor (sanctions) (19 July 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...SUPPRESSION [45] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.20 It must balance the public interest in knowledge of the Tribunal’s work and the wrongdoing of advisers, with the privacy of the individuals involved. [46] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Mr Lawlor’s client. [47] The Tribunal orders that no information identifying the complainant is to be published other than to Immigration NZ....

9. Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to Appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 020 [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...personal) 2014 Work ADHB without my consent individuals in my private life were contacted, which resulted in the below. At work, I was shouted at, bullied, sexually harassed, threatened and discriminated against in a big way. I went through privacy breaches and defamation. Personal home … - as a result of communication between individuals, I did not consent to, I was shouted at, pushed, bullied, sexual insulted/harassed, threatened, things were thrown at me, walls were punch...

10. MOJ0342.2-Homicide-factsheet-FEB22-PRINT.pdf [pdf, 689 KB]

    ...to have a say on things like name suppression, bail, extended supervision orders or parole. You can expect courteous, compassionate and respectful service from court officers, the Police and anyone else involved in the case. You have the right to privacy. The Victims Code has more information about your rights and the treatment you can expect. To find out more, go to victimsinfo.govt.nz If you believe your rights haven’t been met, or you haven’t received the standard of service yo...