Search Results

1. Addressing-Stalking-in-NZ_Final-pack.pdf [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...Ministers of the Crown and officials. 2 Establishing an Offence of Stalking Regulatory Impact Assessment Ministry of Justice 26 September 2024 Some information has been withheld in accordance with section 9(2)(a) of the OIA to protect the privacy of natural persons. 3 Addressing Stalking in New Zealand: Policy Decisions Cabinet Minute CAB-24-MIN-0384 Cabinet Office Meeting date: 30 September 2024 Some information has been withheld in accordance with section 9(2)(f)(iv) of...

2. Implementation of the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 - Regulations and Codes of Practice - Discussion Document [pdf, 486 KB]

   ...should be sent to: Email: international.crime@justice.govt.nz Post: Attention: International Criminal Law team Ministry of Justice | Tahu o te Ture PO Box 180 Wellington 6401 Publication of submissions, the Official Information Act and the Privacy Act The Ministry does not intend to publish comment that it receives on this document. However, any comment will be subject to the Official Information Act 1982 and may, therefore, be released in part or full. The Privacy Act 1993 als...

3. [2009] NZEmpC WC 26/09 Parker v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...purported to place on his return, the company should not necessarily take comfort from the Authority’s determination. As already mentioned, even where granted by contract, requirements to submit to drug testing are significant invasions of personal privacy and autonomy and will be construed strictly. [33] Further, and as already noted, where a genuine dispute, objectively provable as such, arises about the application, interpretation or operation of an employment agreement, the...

4. Gailbraith v CAC 10012 & McNabb [2011] NZREADT 18 [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...correspondence in the bundle seems to suggest that the agreed commission split was 75% to Kellands, 25% to Bayleys. [12] The complaints made by the McNabbs were whittled down in this appeal to three matters: (i) The appellant breached the McNabbs’ privacy by forwarding an e-mail on 2 March to Mr Buckley. (ii) That the appellant made disparaging comments about the McNabbs in an e- mail dated 29 March 2010. (iii) The appellant failed to act in the McNabbs’ best interest by...

5. Peters v Wellington Combined Shuttles (Application by Defendant that Jurisdiction be Declined) [2013] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...Part 1A and Part 2 issues about which the complainant may feel aggrieved. Rather, the jurisdiction of the Tribunal is confined to the “complaint” which was lodged with the Commission at first instance. A not dissimilar system operates under the Privacy Act 1993 and in particular, ss 82(1) and 83 of that Act. See L v T (1998) 5 HRNZ 30 (Morris J, A Knowles, GDS Taylor) at 35. A recent example of those provisions in action is seen in Rafiq v Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand [2...

6. VJ & VL v AE LCRO 88 / 2012 (14 May 2013) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...May 2011 for that amount. [7] The narration of her invoice is as follows: My fee for professional attendances in respect of receiving charges, including attendances on yourselves and Police, attending to execution of Official Information & Privacy Act forms for request of disclosure of Police file, serving same on Police, all attendances at Auckland District Court for bail and resolution of charges, reporting to you and to all incidental matters thereto. [8] The timesheet pr...

7. Cavanagh v Nassiep [2012] NZIACDT 38 (31 July 2012) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...deception occurred after her licence expired, so this is not within the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. [64] Ms Nassiep was also obliged to deal properly with personal documents. She sent personal documents to Mr Cavanagh’s niece, which breached his privacy, and sent copies of other client’s material to his niece with those papers. The papers relating to other clients were sent accidentally. However, those events also occurred after her licence lapsed. [65] Accordingly, in relation to...

8. NNS v MUL [2014] NZIACDT 18 (26 February 2014) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...[15] The adviser held a provisional licence, and accordingly was required to comply with section 19(5) of the Act. She was required to work under “direct supervision of a fully licensed immigration adviser”. [16] The adviser failed to sign a privacy waiver (as required under her supervision agreement). [17] The complainant claimed (not necessarily correctly) that supervision is ongoing; however, the Tribunal is dealing only with this complaint. Accordingly, it is sufficient to note t...

9. SNH v New Zealand Law Society [2009] NZLCDT 2 [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...PUBLICATION [31] Section 240 of the Act provides: “240 Restrictions on publication (1) If the Disciplinary Tribunal is of the opinion that it is proper to do so, having regard to the interest of any person (including (without limitation) the privacy of the complainant (if any)) and to the public interest, it may make any 1 or more of the following orders: (a) an order prohibiting the publication of any report or account of any part of any proceedings before it,...

10. [2018] NZEnvC 011 Reuters Construction Ltd v Whanganui District Council [pdf, 770 KB]

    ...the Kowhainui Retirement Village complex owned and operated by Presbyterian Support Central. At least two of the villas in the Village share that boundary with No 14 and, one can safely assume, could have their amenities of sunshine, shading and privacy affected by building development close to that boundary. [S] That retaining wall (which I shall call the first wall) is of timber construction and is c 2m high, measured from the Retirement Village ground level. It was constructed c2...