Search Results

1. KG & LG v HL [2022] NZDT 11 (28 April 2022) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...the trees, and that the discussion between the parties was solely about trimming the branches that hung over HL’s property. It does not make sense that LG would agree to taking height off the top of the trees, as that would result in a loss of privacy for him and his wife. The only party who benefited from the trees being topped was HL. 12. In addition, it is impossible to say that the trees have been topped. Topping denotes removal of the top part of the trees, but implies that...

2. 20220928-NZBORA-Advice-Deposit-Takers-Bill.pdf [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure, whether of the person, property, correspondence or otherwise. The right protects a number of values including personal property, dignity, and privacy.14 Powers of entry, inspection and information gathering 16. The Bill contains powers of entry and inspection, and to require the provision of information in an investigatory context, that constitute search powers for the purposes...

3. Proactive release – Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism (Prescribed Transactions Reporting) Amendment Regulations 2022 [pdf, 408 KB]

   ...complies with each of the following: 11.1 the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi; 11.2 the rights and freedoms contained in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 or the Human Rights Act 1993; 11.3 the principles and guidelines set out in the Privacy Act 2020 11.4 relevant international standards and obligations; 11.5 the Legislation Guidelines (2021 edition), which are maintained by the Legislation Design and Advisory Committee. ahgqozkok9 2022-12-01 09:17:16 I N C...

4. CEIT Annual Report 2022 [pdf, 446 KB]

   ...now recorded on its website. Only one of those, relating to the Tribunal’s costs jurisdiction, has been appealed. No suppression orders have been made so far, but every endeavour is made to anonymise the identity of claimants to protect their privacy. The Tribunal’s rulings are useful to those resolving disputes outside the Tribunal and the feedback is that this function is highly valued by those providers. Set out below is a list of the issues addressed by the Tribunal over the...

5. MOJ0343.1_YoungWit_Mar18_WEB.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...to have a say on things like name suppression, bail, extended supervision orders or parole. You can expect courteous, compassionate and respectful service from court officers, the police and anyone else involved in the case. You have the right to privacy. Read the Victims Code for more information about your rights and the treatment you can expect. It’s on our website at victimsinfo.govt.nz along with other useful information. If you think your rights have not been met, or you have...

6. FD v B Ltd [2021] NZDT 1714 (23 December 2021) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...unpaid were not legally justified. I am unable to deal with the matter of the referral of FD’s name and details to the debt collectors because I do not have jurisdiction to deal with such an issue, which might be, for example, an application of the Privacy Act. 23. The consequences of stopping the work without legal justification however is a matter I can deal with. This amounts to a breach of the contract, in not carrying out work in accordance with the agreed timetable because B L...

7. [2023] NZREADT 27 – Sharma v CAC 1901 & Brake (3 October 2023) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...parties’ attention to s 116, setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. 11 PUBLICATION [56] Having regard to the interests of the public in the transparency of the Tribunal and knowing of wrongdoing by licensees, as well as the privacy of the people involved, it is appropriate to order publication of the decision. ___________________ D J Plunkett Chair ___________________ C A Sandelin Deputy Chairperson ___________________ G J Denley...

8. 2023-10-11-Rebuttal-Evidence-of-L-Dalzell.pdf [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...vegetation and minimising the land required from them for the project. 8. For those matters not related to property the Project has offered: (a) Close boarded 2.0m high timber fencing along the length of the western property boundary for separation and privacy; BF\64279718\1 Page 2 (b) Consideration of a design that does not prevent a future Queen Street East right turn bay into the Prouse property (into and through their north eastern paddock) that may be needed to service...

9. LCRO 171/2023 PF v DS (1 February 2024) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...direct such publication of his or her decision as the Review Officer considers necessary or desirable in the public interest. “Public interest” engages issues such as consumer protection, public confidence in legal services and the interests and privacy of individuals. [58] Having had regard to the issues raised by this review, I have concluded that it is desirable in the public interest that this decision be published in a form that does not identify the parties or others involved...

10. [2024] NZREADT 13 - BU v REAA & HI (02 May 2024) [pdf, 123 KB]

    ...draws the parties’ attention to s 116, setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. PUBLICATION [59] Having regard to the interests of the public in the transparency of the Tribunal and knowing of wrongdoing by licensees, as well as the privacy of the people involved, it is proper to order publication of the decision of the Tribunal without identifying any party or the agencies. ___________________ D J Plunkett Chair ___________________ P N O’Connor...