Search Results

1. Lethbridge v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Fenton, Fenton v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Lethbridge [2018] NZREADT 58 [pdf, 506 KB]

   ...office to place on the information system. [53] The position was summarised by counsel for the Authority in the following terms: 6.14 Mr Fenton contends that the Committee erred in determining that Ms Lethbridge was not responsible for the privacy breach, which involved confidential information about his health issues being disclosed in the advertising for the Property. 6.15 The key issue here is whether Ms Lethbridge was under an obligation to check the listing before...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 113 Richora Group Ltd v Cheng [pdf, 396 KB]

   ...that, for a higher amount of compensation to be awarded, the claimant would need to amend their pleadings.27 [73] I pause to note that a different approach has been adopted in the High Court in respect of awards for non-pecuniary loss under the Privacy Act 1993. In Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development v Holmes the Court rejected an argument on appeal that the Human Rights Review Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to order an amount in excess of that which had be...

3. Adoption in Aotearoa New Zealand: Summary document - Korean [pdf, 551 KB]

   ...여러분은 본인의 개인정보를 제공받고 수정할 권리가 있습니다. Te Tāhū o te Ture - 법무부의 개인정보 보호정책 전문은 다음 링크에서 확인하실 수 있습니다. https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/privacy_policy/ https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/privacy_policy/ 1 소개 입양은 아동이 친부모가 아닌 다른 단수 또는 복수의 사람의 합법적인 자녀가 되어 양육되는 것을 말합니다....

4. Scope of inquiry Minute October 2021 [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...directed us to ensure that sensitive information was protected, the operational tradecraft of intelligence and security agencies remained confidential and the fair trial rights of the individual were preserved. As well, we wanted to protect the privacy of affected whānau, survivors and witnesses of the terrorist attack, and to respect the wishes of some people who would have been concerned about possible repercussions if their names or comments became public. A private process mean...

5. [2022] NZEnvC 140 Cornelius v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 419 KB]

   ...the proposed place of assembly, accommodation facility and public trail. They seek that the consent be overturned or that more effective conditions be put in place to avoid or mitigate the impacts of the activities on their amenity and privacy and to address the issue of potential trespass. The application for partial early commencement [5] On 1 July 2022 the TCC filed an application under s 116(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) for early commencement of th...

6. OIA-116775 [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   ...information is publicly available or will soon be publicly available. Note that some of the information has been marked out of scope and some of the information has been withheld under the following sections of the Act: • 9(2)(a) to protect the privacy of natural persons, • 9(2)(d) to avoid prejudice to the substantial economic interests of New Zealand, and • 9(2)(f)(iv) to maintain the constitutional conventions that protect confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministe...

7. LCRO 138/2023 FK v LM (12 June 2025) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...necessary to investigate his allegations; (b) he did not have access to the evidence supporting his allegations because it comprised part of an active Family Court file and obtaining it would require leave of the Family Court, with consideration of privacy and publication restrictions; (c) he was advised by the LCS that he should not provide any of the Family Court file and that the LCS would be in contact to request any further information the Committee required; (d) the Committee...

8. [2022] NZEnvC 022 Waikato Regional Council v Waikato District Council [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   Waikato Regional Council v Waikato District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 022 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under clause 14(1) of Schedule 1 to the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) BETWEEN WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2021-AKL-000073) AMBURY PROPERTIES LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-000081) NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY - WAKA KOTAHI (ENV-2021-AKL-000086) Appellants AND WAIKATO DI

9. Trustees of the Rowallan Block XIII Secs 1 and 5 Ahu Whenua Trusts v Orbell - Rowallan Block XIII Secs 1 and 5 Ahu Whenua Trusts (2015) 28 Te Waipounamu MB 37 (28 TWP 37) [pdf, 358 KB]

   ...vendetta”, and payments to third parties were: [An] entirely separate negotiation being outside the scope of the trust’s settlement and involving as it did other peoples’ personal financial affairs – I was/am very careful to keep the Privacy Act in mind. I have looked through my records but I do not have copies of accounts but am confident that the figures will be correct nevertheless. I agree with your email response – eg. What possible advantage can there be to shareh...

10. Nakarawa v AFFCO NZ Ltd [2014] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 168 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 9 Reference No. HRRT 011/2011 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN JALESI NAKARAWA PLAINTIFF AND AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED DEFENDANT AT HAMILTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms PJ Davies, Member Mr MJM Keefe JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr MD Benefield for Plaintiff Ms ME Wilson for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 19 December 2011 DATE OF LAST SUBMISSIONS: 28 Nov