Search Results

1. Proactive-release-20240715-CAB-Regulatory-Systems-Justice-Amendment-Bill_Final.pdf [pdf, 9.6 MB]

   ...the important objective of monitoring and enforcing compliance, supporting the public safety and consumer protection purposes of these regimes respectively. Both powers are limited to documentary evidence, presenting limited intrusion into personal privacy, and not requiring new information to be created. When requiring information from a non-licensed person, a reason to suspect wrongdoing is required. 56 We consider that the use of strict liability offences to enforce the powers is rea...

2. [2023] NZEnvC 190 Donaldson v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 913 KB]

   ...values for neighbours including construction traffic and noise nuisance [78] David Shepherd explained how he and his wife live at 14 Mica Ridge on the southern boundary of the Site. They chose their home for its rural aspect, tranquillity and privacy and “almost 360° uncluttered views” of the framing mountains and other spectacular features of the Basin.35 His evidence noted his concerns about what would be lost to them if up to 30 houses under a Precinct sub-zoning would...

3. Addressing-Stalking-in-NZ_Final-pack.pdf [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...Ministers of the Crown and officials. 2 Establishing an Offence of Stalking Regulatory Impact Assessment Ministry of Justice 26 September 2024 Some information has been withheld in accordance with section 9(2)(a) of the OIA to protect the privacy of natural persons. 3 Addressing Stalking in New Zealand: Policy Decisions Cabinet Minute CAB-24-MIN-0384 Cabinet Office Meeting date: 30 September 2024 Some information has been withheld in accordance with section 9(2)(f)(iv) of...

4. Implementation of the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 - Regulations and Codes of Practice - Discussion Document [pdf, 486 KB]

   ...should be sent to: Email: international.crime@justice.govt.nz Post: Attention: International Criminal Law team Ministry of Justice | Tahu o te Ture PO Box 180 Wellington 6401 Publication of submissions, the Official Information Act and the Privacy Act The Ministry does not intend to publish comment that it receives on this document. However, any comment will be subject to the Official Information Act 1982 and may, therefore, be released in part or full. The Privacy Act 1993 als...

5. [2009] NZEmpC WC 26/09 Parker v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...purported to place on his return, the company should not necessarily take comfort from the Authority’s determination. As already mentioned, even where granted by contract, requirements to submit to drug testing are significant invasions of personal privacy and autonomy and will be construed strictly. [33] Further, and as already noted, where a genuine dispute, objectively provable as such, arises about the application, interpretation or operation of an employment agreement, the...

6. Gailbraith v CAC 10012 & McNabb [2011] NZREADT 18 [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...correspondence in the bundle seems to suggest that the agreed commission split was 75% to Kellands, 25% to Bayleys. [12] The complaints made by the McNabbs were whittled down in this appeal to three matters: (i) The appellant breached the McNabbs’ privacy by forwarding an e-mail on 2 March to Mr Buckley. (ii) That the appellant made disparaging comments about the McNabbs in an e- mail dated 29 March 2010. (iii) The appellant failed to act in the McNabbs’ best interest by...

7. Peters v Wellington Combined Shuttles (Application by Defendant that Jurisdiction be Declined) [2013] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...Part 1A and Part 2 issues about which the complainant may feel aggrieved. Rather, the jurisdiction of the Tribunal is confined to the “complaint” which was lodged with the Commission at first instance. A not dissimilar system operates under the Privacy Act 1993 and in particular, ss 82(1) and 83 of that Act. See L v T (1998) 5 HRNZ 30 (Morris J, A Knowles, GDS Taylor) at 35. A recent example of those provisions in action is seen in Rafiq v Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand [2...

8. VJ & VL v AE LCRO 88 / 2012 (14 May 2013) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...May 2011 for that amount. [7] The narration of her invoice is as follows: My fee for professional attendances in respect of receiving charges, including attendances on yourselves and Police, attending to execution of Official Information & Privacy Act forms for request of disclosure of Police file, serving same on Police, all attendances at Auckland District Court for bail and resolution of charges, reporting to you and to all incidental matters thereto. [8] The timesheet pr...

9. Cavanagh v Nassiep [2012] NZIACDT 38 (31 July 2012) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...deception occurred after her licence expired, so this is not within the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. [64] Ms Nassiep was also obliged to deal properly with personal documents. She sent personal documents to Mr Cavanagh’s niece, which breached his privacy, and sent copies of other client’s material to his niece with those papers. The papers relating to other clients were sent accidentally. However, those events also occurred after her licence lapsed. [65] Accordingly, in relation to...

10. NNS v MUL [2014] NZIACDT 18 (26 February 2014) [pdf, 118 KB]

    ...[15] The adviser held a provisional licence, and accordingly was required to comply with section 19(5) of the Act. She was required to work under “direct supervision of a fully licensed immigration adviser”. [16] The adviser failed to sign a privacy waiver (as required under her supervision agreement). [17] The complainant claimed (not necessarily correctly) that supervision is ongoing; however, the Tribunal is dealing only with this complaint. Accordingly, it is sufficient to note t...