Search Results

1. [2024] NZIACDT 02 - NS v Registrar (8 January 2024) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...[50] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.5 It must balance the public’s interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and also of the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. [51] There is no public interest in knowing the name of the adviser against whom the complaint is made or of his wife, particularly given the complaint has failed. Nor is there any public interest in knowing the ide...

2. [2023] NZREADT 24 - CAC 2103 v Lieven (21 August 2023) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...(d) of the RTA). (b) Ms Lieven had not breached s 48(3)(b) of the RTA as no viewings of the property had taken place. (c) Ms Lieven’s conduct breached s 38(2) of the RTA in that she interfered with the tenants’ reasonable peace, comfort or privacy. 5 (d) The tenants had acted reasonably to seek basic conditions for entry under s 48(3A) of the RTA. (e) Ms Lieven’s response to the tenants after the complainant issued a trespass notice – “Then I’ll sue you for eac...

3. OIA-121215.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...1, along with my decision on their release. Some information within these documents has been withheld as it is out of scope of your request and some has been withheld under the following provisions of the Act: • section 9(2)(a) to protect the privacy of natural persons, and • section 9(2)(f)(iv) to maintain the constitutional conventions that protect confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers and officials. In withholding information under section 9 the Ministry has considered t...

4. LCRO 131/2024 RD v PS (28 January 2025) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...direct such publication of his or her decision as the Review Officer considers necessary or desirable in the public interest. “Public interest” engages issues such as consumer protection, public confidence in legal services and the interests and privacy of individuals. [58] Having had regard to the issues raised by this review, I have concluded that it is desirable in the public interest that this decision be published in a form that does not identify the parties or others involved i...

5. [2025] NZIACDT 24 - INZ v Ma (31 March 2025) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...[55] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.13 It must balance the public’s interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and knowing the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. [56] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Ms Ma’s client. [57] The Tribunal orders that no information identifying the client is to be published other than to Immigration NZ. _______________...

6. [2025] NZREADT 15 – UJ v REAA (19 May 2025) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...116, setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. PUBLICATION [54] Having regard to the interests of the public in knowing of any professional wrongdoing of licensees and also the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, balancing that against the privacy of the individuals involved, it is appropriate to order publication of the Ruling without naming the licensees, the agency or any person. ___________________ D J Plunkett Chair ___________________ G J Denley Member...

7. [2024] NZIACDT 29 INZ v Li (6 December 2024) [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...[61] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.14 It must balance the public’s interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and knowing the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. [62] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Ms Li’s client, the employer, its manager or the agents. [63] The Tribunal orders that no information identifying the client, the employer, its manager...

8. [2024] NZIACDT 30 INZ v Li (6 December 2024) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...[58] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.14 It must balance the public’s interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and knowing the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. [59] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Ms Li’s client, the employer or the agents. [60] The Tribunal orders that no information identifying the client, the employer or the agents is to be pub...

9. Hikaiti-Molloy v Hall - Succession to Timi Kaukau [2025] Chief Judge's MB 92 (2025 CJ 92) [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...Applicant’s evidence: 16. Matilda and Ariana submitted the following documents at various times that were not available at the lower court hearing. Some documents are clearer than others and used for clarity. Due to the sensitivity and privacy of these documents they are not for public inspection or distribution and only available to the Court. A list of the documents is tabled below: Date Document Detail of Document 3.9.1958 Complaint for Matter Determinable Summarily...

10. [2024] NZIACDT 25 - EM v Ma (25 October 2024) [pdf, 244 KB]

    ...[63] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.20 It must balance the public’s interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and knowing the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. 20 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50A. 14 [64] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Ms Ma’s client, the employer, its director or the agents. [65] The Tribunal orders that no infor...