Search Results

1. [2025] NZIACDT 45 - NA v Wharekura (2 September 2025) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...[68] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.10 It must balance the public interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and also of the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. [69] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Mr Wharekura’s client, nor the details of Mr Wharekura’s health. [70] The Tribunal directs publication of the decision, but orders that no information id...

2. [2025] NZIACT 42 – CE v Asici (14 August 2025) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...[64] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.11 It must balance the public interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and also of the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. 11 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 50A. 13 [65] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Ms Asici’s client. [66] The Tribunal directs publication of the decision, but orders that no info...

3. [2025] NZIACDT 33 - KM v Jiang (16 June 2025) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...[64] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.17 It must balance the public interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and also of the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. [65] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Mr Jiang’s client, or the agent (or the border company), or the employer. [66] The Tribunal directs publication of the decision without identifying the com...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 206 Fox v Hereworth School Trust Board [pdf, 620 KB]

   EMMA YUEN SEE FOX v HEREWORTH SCHOOL TRUST BOARD NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2015] NZEmpC 206 [25 November 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2015] NZEmpC 206 WRC 5/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN EMMA YUEN SEE FOX Plaintiff AND HEREWORTH SCHOOL TRUST BOARD Defendant Hearing: 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 September, and 19 and 20 November 2014 (Heard at Hastings)

5. All charges and convicted charges December 2018 [xlsx, 874 KB]

   ...procedures Offences against justice procedures, nec 54 58 93 99 103 91 130 241 388 420 507 627 684 456 350 291 267 374 310 289 216 231 683 150 150 277 245 649 515 558 921 321 299 177 154 144 159 257 415 16: Miscellaneous offences 161: Defamation, libel and privacy offences Defamation and libel 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 16: Miscellaneous offences 161: Defamation, libel and privacy offences Offences against privacy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 1 3...

6. Proactive-release-Review-of-the-Operation-and-Performance-of-the-Public-Defence-Service-2021.pdf [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...outreach space. 23. All in all, we estimate that we spoke with more than 200 people (and we give an indicative list in Appendix 3). As we have said, the views we received were remarkably consistent and for that reason and for confidentiality/privacy reasons we have not attributed comments to individuals in this report. 24. We completed the bulk of our interviews with stakeholders by early June, then began drafting this report. At that stage, we sought and received certain add...

7. 2014 Ministry of Justice Annual Report [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...proposes increased penalties for the possession, import or export of objectionable material. The Bill also proposes that prison is the expected sentence for a repeat child pornography offence. In 2013/14, the Ministry also progressed changes to the Privacy Act by introducing mechanisms that enable agencies to share information transparently and with accountability. Improving safeguards The Bail Amendment Act 2013 came into force on 4 September 2013. By putting greater emphasis on vi...

8. RIS - Control Orders [pdf, 918 KB]

   ...unintended impact of the control order regime is that individuals subject to control orders may face social repercussions due to the order being in place. However, this is mitigated by the fact that control orders are not publicised to protect the privacy of the individual. In addition, judges can request an assessment of the reintegration needs of the individual subject to the control order, and consider an individual’s need to attend their place of employment or study, when settin...

9. [2022] NZEnvC 220 Chen v New Zealand Transport Agency - Waka Kotahi [pdf, 662 KB]

   Chen v NZ Transport Agency IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 220 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 174 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN WEIRONG CHEN (ENV-2020-AKL-169) Appellant AND NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY – WAKA KOTAHI Respondent Court: Hearing: Appearances: Chief Environment Court Judge D A Kirkpatrick Environment Commissioner K Prime Environment Commissioner R M Bartle

10. [2021] NZEmpC 167 UXK v Talent Propeller Ltd [pdf, 379 KB]

    UXK v TALENT PROPELLER LIMITED [2021] NZEmpC 167 [5 October 2021] NON-PUBLICATION OF THE NAME, ADDRESS AND IDENTIFYING DETAILS OF UXK AND AS TO THE CONTENTS OF THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT REFERRED TO HEREIN IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 167 EMPC 226/2021 IN THE MATTER OF an application for judicial review BETWEEN UXK Applicant AND TALENT PROPELL