Canterbury Westland Standards Committee No. 1 v Grave [2016] NZLCDT 8 [pdf, 62 KB]
...submissions of Mr Shaw. The discretion, which is a broad one, resides in s 240 of the Act. There is a starting point of openness, and thus a threshold for the practitioner to reach to displace such openness, by establishing that his interests in privacy outweigh the public interest in knowing, not only the details of the conduct but also the name of the practitioner against whom the finding has been made. [38] On behalf of the practitioner, Mr Gallaway strongly advanced the notion t...