Search Results

1. Greyling v Gimranov [2016] NZIACDT 55 (15 September 2016) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...approach was predicated on Mr Gimranov agreeing to complete the course; [6.2] He said completing the whole course would be unreasonable, as he had excellent client references; [6.3] He claimed Mr Greyling could not see the client references due to privacy considerations; [6.4] He expected the refund of fees to be discounted due to the work he had performed; [6.5] He accepted a caution, but expected the Tribunal to discount the penalty due to the fact he was an employee. Mr Greyling...

2. Mark Brown (filed 6 June 2017) [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...under way very soon. 9. Blueskin Bay is a mixed community, socio-economically, politically and culturally. From my observation people move out here because they love the local environment, the beaches, open space, room to garden, peace and quiet, privacy, recreational opportunities and being part of a small inter-related, well-functioning and well-resourced community. 10. I have attached a list (Appendix 1) of local groups, events and organisations to demonstrate what an active, wel...

3. Napier v Registrar of the Real Estate Agents Authority [2019] NZREADT 7 (25 Feb 2019) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...[29] Ms Goatley went on to submit that there is no proper basis for any restriction on publication. She submitted that the subject matter leading to the proceedings before the Tribunal is largely in the public domain, such that there is no privacy interest which is sufficient to outweigh the starting point of open justice. [30] Finally, Ms Goatley submitted that it is not for the Tribunal to make orders on the basis of concerns as to what NZME might publish. She submitted tha...

4. Family Court rewrite submission: Save the Children [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...representative or an appropriate body, in a manner consistent with the procedural rule of national law8. • Article 13: The child has the right to freedom of expression and to seek and receive accurate information. • Article 16: The child has the right to protection of their privacy. • Article 19: The child has the right to protection from all forms of harm. Personal story – as part of our submission we have included Frances’s Story, see Appendix One (p 8). This story shares...

5. Gravatt v Bulmer (Strike-Out Application) [2014] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 81 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 40 Reference No. HRRT 004/2014 UNDER SECTION 50 OF THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN GARY LANCE GRAVATT PLAINTIFF AND DAVID BULMER DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr GJ Cook JP, Member Mr BK Neeson, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr GL Gravatt in person Mr WG Manning for defendant DATE OF DECISION: 1 September 2014 D

6. [2016] NZEmpC 162 Broadspectrum v Nathan [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...seeking a declaration from the Authority about its ability to place Mr Nathan in another position. [33] Mr Cleary took issue with that submission. He pointed out the difficulties faced by Mr Nathan’s former lawyer in obtaining information in a Privacy Act request and the integrity of the investigation being compromised. [34] While noting Mr Cleary’s submission, I accept that the appeal is being pursued for bona fide reasons and is being pursued diligently. The effect o...

7. FINAL CE Gifts Benefits Expenses Disclosure Workbook 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020 [xlsx, 2.7 MB]

   ...apply and therefore all items are disclosed, unless there is a very good reason not to. The Ombudsman’s view is that "because this expenditure is incurred by very senior employees acting in an official capacity and for a business purpose, the privacy interests of the chief executives who incurred the expenditure are low". Gifts and benefits All gifts, invitations to events and other hospitality, of $50 or more in total value per year, accepted or declined by the CE from people ext...

8. Chief Executive Expenses: 1 February 2019 - 30 June 2019 [xlsx, 68 KB]

   ...apply and therefore all items are disclosed, unless there is a very good reason not to. The Ombudsman’s view is that "because this expenditure is incurred by very senior employees acting in an official capacity and for a business purpose, the privacy interests of the chief executives who incurred the expenditure are low". Gifts and benefits All gifts, invitations to events and other hospitality, of $50 or more in total value per year, accepted or declined by the CE from people ext...

9. Chief Executive Expenses: 1 July 2020 - 30 June 2021 [xlsx, 75 KB]

   ...apply and therefore all items are disclosed, unless there is a very good reason not to. The Ombudsman’s view is that "because this expenditure is incurred by very senior employees acting in an official capacity and for a business purpose, the privacy interests of the chief executives who incurred the expenditure are low". Gifts and benefits All gifts, invitations to events and other hospitality, of $50 or more in total value per year, accepted or declined by the CE from people ext...

10. [2021] NZREADT 41 - London v Cartwright (3 August 2021) [pdf, 294 KB]

    ...[42] Section 108 of the Act provides (as relevant): 108 Restrictions on publishing (1) If the Disciplinary Tribunal is of the opinion that it is proper to do so, having regard to the interest of any person (including (without limitation) the privacy of the complainant (if any)) and to the public interest, it may make 1 or more of the following orders: (a) an order prohibiting the publication of any report or account of any part of any proceedings before it, whether held in public...