Search Results

1. Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2025] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 388 KB]

   ...suppressed. [9] While there is public interest in details of the defendant’s breaches of the Code being published, there is little or no public interest in the publication of Mrs A’s name, nor those of Mr B (deceased) and Mr C. We consider that their privacy interests outweigh any public interest in knowing their names. [10] We find that the presumption of open justice is satisfied by the publication of the Tribunal’s decision and the agreed summary of facts, with Mrs A’s, Mr B’s a...

2. [2024] NZIACDT 23 - FM v Yang (03 September 2024) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...[72] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.18 It must balance the public interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and also of the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. [73] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Mr Yang’s client, the agent or the employer. [74] The Tribunal orders that no information identifying the complainant, the agent or the employer is to be p...

3. [2025] NZLVT 009 - Jansseune v Kaipara District Council (14 March 2025) [pdf, 9.3 MB]

   ...multiple houses, the only place another house could be built is adjacent to his current house. This is mostly unlikely to have been acceptable to either 7 the Council or to Mr Jansseune, as he reflected on a number of occasions his desire for privacy. As far as the quality of the land is concerned, Mr Kanji accepted that it is relatively steep in places and relatively low quality. He suggested that the approximately 3,700m² of bush had a value of around $5,000 per hectare, or...

4. [2025] NZIACDT 37 - ZH v Ma (23 July 2025) [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...[59] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.22 It must balance the public’s interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and knowing the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. [60] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Ms Ma’s client or the nature of her medical condition. [61] The Tribunal directs publication of the decision, but orders that no information identifying t...

5. January National Panui 2021 [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...2020 10 – 14 May 2021 3 February 2021 9 – 13 August 2021 5 May 2021 8 – 12 November 2021 4 August 2021 7 – 11 February 2022 3 November 2021 * Actual venues, dates and times to be advised Kohi-Tätea / JANUARY 2021 - NATIONAL PÄNUI 23 PRIVACY STATEMENT: This information is required to enable us to forward a copy of the monthly National Pänui to you. Information about you will not be disclosed to any other person in a form that will identify you except where you have consen...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 192 Johnson v Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 394 KB]

   ...Johnson had provided. A further meeting was proposed to enable him to provide a response. At the same time, internal NZDF emails regarding the matter were provided, in response to a request that had been made on Mr Johnson’s behalf under the Privacy Act 1993. [37] Mr Johnson has a heart condition. He said that this process had become increasingly stressful for him. On 12 February 2018, his general practitioner (GP) noted increased blood pressure. On 15 February 2018, he was...

7. January 2020 National Panui [pdf, 255 KB]

   Contents: Applications for hearing in JANUARY | KOHI-TÄTEA 2020: ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz JANUARY | KOHI-TÄTEA 2020 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more i

8. [2023] NZEnvC 211 Masterton District Council [pdf, 782 KB]

   ...and amenity. 4. Site topography and orientation and whether the residential unit(s) and vehicle access point can be more appropriately located to minimise adverse visual amenity effects. 5. Effect on nearby properties, including outlook and privacy. 6. Whether the residential unit(s) and the vehicle access point can be more appropriately located to maintain, enhance, or restore indigenous biodiversity values. 7. The ability to mitigate adverse effects through the use of scr...

9. [2021] NZEnvC 034 Coneburn Preserve Holdings Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA K IOTAUTAHI Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 34 IN THE j'vIA TIER of the Resource 1vianagement Act 1991 AND appeals under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act BET\X/EEN CONEBURN PRESERVE HOLDINGS LUvIITED & OTHERS AND Court: Hearing: Last case event: Appearances: (ENV-2018-CH C-13 7) A & J SCHRANTZ (ENV-2018-CHC-061) WEI HENG FONG (ENV-2018-CHC-116) Appellants QUEENSTO\VN LAKES DISTRIC

10. Justice: our people, our communities [pdf, 6.2 MB]

    ...prisoners, more capacity, and generally just a safer, nicer environment.’ Tere Rei, Senior Sergeant, Acting District Custody Manager, helped get the new approach up and running at the Police end. ‘There were some initial concerns about privacy, so we decided to trial it for three months and then reassess. At the end of the trial, we only had one complaint – about our seats being too hard,’ says Tere. ‘We were acutely aware of the optics regarding privacy and integri...