Search Results

1. LCRO 52/2022 AD v OC (12 July 2024) [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...such publication of his or her decision as the Review Officer considers necessary or desirable in the public interest. “Public interest” engages issues such as consumer protection, public confidence in legal services and the interests and privacy of individuals. [81] Having had regard to the issues raised by this review, I have concluded that it is desirable in the public interest that this decision be published in a form that does not identify the parties or others involved in...

2. [2024] NZREADT 01 - CAC 2106 v Pang (8 January 2024) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...Pang’s submissions are to be filed and served by 20 February 2024. [55] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. PUBLICATION [56] Having regard to the privacy of the vendor and her daughter as well as the interests of the public in the transparency of the Tribunal, it is appropriate to order 15 publication of this decision without identifying the vendor or the vendor’s daughter,...

3. Returning-Offenders-Management-and-Information-Act-2015_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...Analysis team at the Treasury and the Ministry of Justice have agreed that a post-implementation review will be developed and provided to Cabinet in the coming months. Compliance 15 The Bill complies with the principles and guidelines set out in the Privacy Act 2020. 16 The Bill confirms the original policy intent of the ROMI Act. Consequently, the Bill does not raise new Treaty of Waitangi issues beyond those the ROMI Act already creates. 17 The Bill may not comply with the NZBORA...

4. [2025] NZIACDT 21 – KA v Wen (5 March 2025) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...[78] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.27 It must balance the public interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers and also of the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, with the privacy of individuals. [79] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Ms Wen’s client or any other named person or the Chinese agency. [80] The Tribunal orders that no information identifying the client, the Chinese agency or...

5. 2024 NZPSPLA 093.pdf [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...instructions. The concern is really with the nature of the instructions. [90] However, in following the client’s instructions regarding toileting, food and bedding I find the behaviour unsatisfactory. Ms AL was kept in a small area without electricity, privacy, warmth and real access to food or bathroom facilities. She could have left the building and yet she understood that she legally did not have to. [91] I am also satisfied that Mr SK as director of AE breached the Act by al...

6. [2024] NZREADT 38 – TX v REAA (22 October 2024) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...116, setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. PUBLICATION [89] Having regard to the interests of the public in knowing of any professional wrongdoing of licensees and also the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, balancing that against the privacy of the individuals involved, it is appropriate to order publication of the decision without naming the property management company or any person. ___________________ C Sandelin Deputy Chairperson ___________________...

7. National Standards Committee v Poananga [2012] NZLCDT 12 [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...following an interim decision of the Tribunal which initially would have only suppressed the Practitioner’s name until 23 April for the reasons given in that decision, a medical certificate was provided by counsel for the Practitioner. Due to privacy considerations, we do not propose to go into the details of that certificate save as to comment that it was equivocal in its expression, that it raised questions about her capacity to instruct her counsel, and may have had some impli...

8. Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Hong [2020] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...guidance to Farrington v Rowe McBride & Partners [1985] 1 NZLR 83 (CA) and Clark Boyce v Mouat [1993] 3 NZLR 641 (PC). (2) In taking the steps under paragraph 1(i) of this rule practitioners should note the duties under Rule 1.08 and under the Privacy Act 1993. (3) Practitioners are referred to Re A; High Court Auckland, AP59 – SW01; 19.12.01; Fisher, Williams, Harrison JJ, in which the full court held (at paragraph 43) that a conflict of interest arises in any situation where the...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 176 Waimarino Queenstown Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 942 KB]

   B PROPERTY GROUP LTD v QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL – INTERIM DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 176 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN WAIMARINO QUEENSTOWN LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR TO) B PROPERTY GROUP LIMITED (ENV-2023-CHC-1) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven

10. Adoption in Aotearoa New Zealand: Summary document - Maori [pdf, 322 KB]

    ...mōhiohio whaiaro mōu me ngā mōhiohio ka whakaratoa e koe. Nōu tonu te mana kia whakahokia, ā, kia whakatikahia tēnei mōhiohio whaiaro. Te Tāhū o te Ture - Ka taea te kite i te ture matatapu nui i konei: https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/privacy_policy/ https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/privacy_policy/ 1 Whakataki Ko te adoption, te āhuatanga e whakamanatia ā-ture ai kia whakatipuria ai tētahi tamaiti e tētahi atu tangata, tāngata rānei, i tua...