3009 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 32 Reference No. HRRT 022/2014 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN BRETT JAMES TAYLOR PLAINTIFF AND ORCON LIMITED DEFENDANT AT PALMERSTON NORTH BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr RK Musuku, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms SN Taylor for plaintiff Mr BR Edwards for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 20 April 2015 DATE OF DECISION: 14 May 2015 DA...
...PARTICULARS OF THE VICTIMS (3) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 21 Reference No. HRRT 006/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND THE SENSIBLE SENTENCING GROUP TRUST DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Ms K Anderson, Member REPR...
...was signed and had failed to provide a list of the prospective purchasers when their agency ended. This amounted to unsatisfactory conduct. The Freears were each censured and fined $3,000. The Committee decided to take no further action on the privacy complaint concerning the photograph and a complaint against the agency for failing to properly supervise Ms Freear. [4] The Lammases appeal to the Tribunal against the Committee’s dismissal of the photography and supervision compl...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 1 Reference No. HRRT 025/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN STEPHEN IAN HOOD PLAINTIFF AND AMERICAN EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL (NZ) INCORPORATED DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr SI Hood in person Mr AS Olney and Mr ML Campbell for defendant DATE OF DECISION: 23 January...
Reference No. HRRT 011/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN LISA TURNER PLAINTIFF AND THE UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO DEFENDANT AT DUNEDIN BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Ms DL Hart, Member REPRESENTATION: Dr L Turner in person Mr M Couling for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 12 and 13 October 2015; 2 to 5 May 2016 DATE OF SUBSTANTIVE DECISION: 25 March 2021 DATE OF DECISION ON COSTS: 28 October 2021 DECI...
...arrest powers. On 24 March 2025, your request was transferred from the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha to the Ministry of Justice in accordance with section 14(b)(ii) of the Act. I understand you made the same request to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner which has also been referred to the Ministry of Justice. Specifically, you requested: Copies of any feedback the department provided the Ministry of Justice regarding amendments to the Crime Act related to citizen’s arr...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 50 Reference No. HRRT 010/2014 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN ANATOLY KERN PLAINTIFF AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr GJ Cook JP, Member Mr BK Neeson, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Kern in person Ms J Foster and Ms N Gray for defendant DATE OF DECISION: 10 October 2014 DECISIO...
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 22 October 2024 Ref: OIA 116395 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Defamation and privacy claims Thank you for your email of 27 August 2024 requesting information relating to defamation and privacy claims under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act). Specifically, you requested: • A list of all claims brought in the...
...of this Contract 3.8.6. the Provider has been declared bankrupt, and 3.8.7. the Provider’s firm has been placed into liquidation. 3.8.A The Provider must immediately notify the Secretary’s Contract Manager as soon as they become aware of a privacy breach (as defined in clause 3.22 of this Contract) and all relevant details of the breach 3.9. If the Provider is a Supervised Provider, they must notify the Secretary’s Contract Manager of any material change to the supervision arran...
...into a restructuring plan; (c) if it did, whether it failed to meet its obligations to Mr Evans, in particular in relation to concerns that he raised about it; (d) whether the Court has jurisdiction to consider Mr Evans’s complaint regarding privacy; (e) if it does, whether JNJ breached Mr Evans’s privacy such as to disadvantage him unjustifiably; (f) whether JNJ breached Mr Evans’s employment agreement; (g) whether JNJ failed to act in good faith; and (h) if any of M...