2939 items matching your search terms
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 132 Ref: LCRO 55/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN EFH and KFH Applicants AND SP and NR Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introd
...levelled allegations against Ms Gribben, including allegations regarding Inframax’s timing for raising allegations about Mr Kavallaris’ mobile data and internet usage and that when raising these allegations, Inframax had breached Mr Kavallaris’ privacy. [12] On 16 April 2024 Inframax’s lawyer, Blair Scotland, responded to Ms Greenwood and advised that it did not consider that the allegations raised by Ms Greenwood required any further action. [13] On 16 April 202...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 094 Ref: LCRO 158/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN QMY Applicant AND WAN Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The applicant,
‘Parenting Through Separation’ Programme Evaluation of the Evaluation of the ‘Parenting Through Separation’ Programme Prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Jeremy Robertson and Jan Pryor Roy McKenzie Centre for the Study of Families, Victoria University July 2009 Disclaimer All reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the information provide
Contents: Applications for hearing in AUGUST | HERE-TURI-KÖKA 2020: ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz AUGUST | HERE-TURI-KÖKA 2020 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For m
The Sex Industry in New Zealand: A Literature Review Jan Jordan This literature review was commissioned by the Ministry of Justice. The report has been prepared by the author and the views expressed in it are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Ministry of Justice. March 2005 2 First pub
1 Regulatory Impact Statement Vulnerable Children's Bill -Child Harm Prevention Orders Agency disclosure statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) was prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of options to address concerns around people who have been: • convicted of, or found on the balance of probabilities (more likely than not) to have committed, a specified offence, against a child or children; and • who pose a high risk
...Ms Burgess was employed. [98] I do not accept this submission. While dismissal may be an intensely distressing experience, it is not uncommon for employees who have been dismissed to hide their feelings from others in order to preserve their privacy and their pride. I also find Ms Burgess’ explanation that she carried on working for the rest of the week because she needed the money entirely credible. [99] In the course of her evidence, Ms Reynolds described how she dealt with...
...including the particular nature of their disabilities, their behavioural issues and the treatment and care regimes they required. In reaching my decision, I have had careful regard to all of that evidence but, in the interests of maintaining the privacy and dignity of the children and their families, I do not record it in detail in this judgment. I will, however, refer to some characteristics of particular children when I discuss the application of the CEA to the work done by the...
...position, 23 January 2009, Mr Quigg wrote again to the Department’s solicitors seeking an extension of time to consider the offer. In doing so, he relied principally on an earlier request for information under the Official Information Act and the Privacy Act which had not then been satisfied. The Department responded by extending the time for Mr Porteous to accept the revised offer until 25 February 2009. [32] In early February 2009, a work permit for Mr Porteous was approved by...