Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 97 Doran v Crest Commercial Cleaning Ltd [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...agreements. Indeed, somewhat to the contrary, s 69OC(6) requires: (6) Employee transfer costs information provided under this section must be provided— (a) in aggregate form; and (b) to the extent practicable, in a form that protects the privacy of the employees concerned. [59] A further factor affecting this issue is that disclosure may only be sought where the party seeking information is negotiating an agreement, deciding whether to enter into an agreement or tendering f...

2. Hill - Otakanini Māori Reservation (2015) 108 Taitokerau MB 76 (108 TTK 76) [pdf, 423 KB]

   108 Taitokerau MB 76 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20140009232 A20150003382 UNDER Sections 37(3), 239, 240, 338(7) and 338(8), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 Regulation 3(f), Māori Reservation Regulations 1994 IN THE MATTER OF Otakanini Māori Reservation BETWEEN PEARL HILL Applicant Hearing: 17 February 2015 25 May 2015 8 June 2015 (Heard at Auckland and Whangarei) Judgment: 14 August 20

3. [2017] NZEnvC 209 Auckland Council v London Pacific Family Trust [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...bulk and form that maintains and is in keeping with the character and amenity value of the established residential neighbourhood ... (4) Require the height, bulk and location of development to maintain a reasonable level of sunlight access and privacy and to minimize visual dominance effects to the adjoining sites. [29] We pause at this point to observe that there is clear recognition in these SHZ provisions of the capacity for special character to inform amenity values. That suggests...

4. LCRO 127/2017 EZ v UO [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...13 [Company B] v EZ HC Auckland [citation removed], 18 May 2015 at [8] (emphasis in original). 14 [Company B] v EZ HC Auckland [citation removed, 12 June 2015 at [2]. 14 entitlement to copies under the Privacy Act. If there are ongoing delays on Mr UO’s part, he can expect the matter to be referred to the Law Society. [78] The court then turned its attention to costs. Costs of $6,868 were awarded in favour of the plaintiff, with the provi

5. Cooper v Standards Committee LCRO 280/2013, 281/2013, 324/2013, 325/2013, 34/2014, 118/2014 (17 April 2015) [pdf, 406 KB]

   ...provides: When deciding whether to publish the identity of a person who is the subject of a censure order, a Standards Committee and the Board must take into account the public interest and, if appropriate, the impact of publication on the interests and privacy of - (a) the complainant; and (b) clients of the censured person; and (c) relatives of the censured person; and (d) partner, employers, and associates of the censured person; and (e) the censured person....

6. Family Court rewrite submission: Backbone Collective [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...used by the Judge to order unsafe parenting orders. 10 Women are only able to read the psychologists report in their lawyer’s office but not to take notes or take a copy away with them. This provision appears to fly in the face of NZ’s privacy laws and fundamental human rights (and those of most other westernised countries) that give citizens the right to a copy of the information that is held about them and the right to ask for this to be corrected if it is factually inac...

7. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 (2019) 217 Waiariki MB 85 (217 WAR 85) [pdf, 536 KB]

   ...the time that has elapsed since the communication was made or the information was compiled or prepared; and (ii) the extent to which the information has already been disclosed to other persons; and (g) society’s interest in protecting the privacy of victims of offences and, in particular, victims of sexual offences. (4) The Judge may, in addition to the matters stated in subsection (3), have regard to any other matters that the Judge considers relevant. (5) A Judge may giv...

8. RIS Criminal Cases Review Commission [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...wrongful convictions undermine the integrity of our criminal justice system. In January and February 2018 Justice officials undertook targeted consultation with the judiciary, investigative bodies (Independent Police Conduct Authority, Office of the Privacy Commissioner and the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security), representative leaders of the law profession, academics and other key stakeholders to test the proposed model for a CCRC. Targeted consultation also included co...

9. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - discussion document [pdf, 408 KB]

   ...kept confidential because it is sensitive personal information. The Ministry of Justice will take your views into account when responding to such requests. https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/ mailto:humanrights@justice.govt.nz 7 The Privacy Act 2020 governs how the Ministry collects, holds, uses, and discloses personal information about you and the information you provide. You have the right to access and correct personal information. The Ministry will proactively release...

10. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - discussion document - large print [pdf, 458 KB]

    ...clearly and explain why. For example, you may wish for some information to be kept confidential because it is sensitive personal information. The Ministry of Justice will take your views into account when responding to such requests. Page 7 The Privacy Act 2020 governs how the Ministry collects, holds, uses, and discloses personal information about you and the information you provide. You have the right to access and correct personal information. The Ministry will proactivel...