Search Results

Search results for privacy.

3011 items matching your search terms

  1. Evaluation of Parenting Through Separation programme [pdf, 2.8 MB]

    ‘Parenting Through Separation’ Programme Evaluation of the Evaluation of the ‘Parenting Through Separation’ Programme Prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Jeremy Robertson and Jan Pryor Roy McKenzie Centre for the Study of Families, Victoria University July 2009 Disclaimer All reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the information provide

  2. August National Panui 2020 [pdf, 494 KB]

    Contents: Applications for hearing in AUGUST | HERE-TURI-KÖKA 2020: ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz AUGUST | HERE-TURI-KÖKA 2020 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For m

  3. The sex industry in New Zealand: a literature review [pdf, 470 KB]

    The Sex Industry in New Zealand: A Literature Review Jan Jordan This literature review was commissioned by the Ministry of Justice. The report has been prepared by the author and the views expressed in it are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Ministry of Justice. March 2005 2 First pub

  4. Regulatory Impact Statement Vulnerable childrens bill child harm prevention orders [pdf, 234 KB]

    1 Regulatory Impact Statement Vulnerable Children's Bill -Child Harm Prevention Orders Agency disclosure statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) was prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of options to address concerns around people who have been: • convicted of, or found on the balance of probabilities (more likely than not) to have committed, a specified offence, against a child or children; and • who pose a high risk

  5. [2007] NZEmpC CC 5/07 Reynolds v Burgess [pdf, 116 KB]

    ...Ms Burgess was employed. [98] I do not accept this submission. While dismissal may be an intensely distressing experience, it is not uncommon for employees who have been dismissed to hide their feelings from others in order to preserve their privacy and their pride. I also find Ms Burgess’ explanation that she carried on working for the rest of the week because she needed the money entirely credible. [99] In the course of her evidence, Ms Reynolds described how she dealt with...

  6. [2007] NZEmpC AC 13/07 Red Beach School Board of Trustees & Ors v New Zealand Education Institute (Inc) [pdf, 135 KB]

    ...including the particular nature of their disabilities, their behavioural issues and the treatment and care regimes they required. In reaching my decision, I have had careful regard to all of that evidence but, in the interests of maintaining the privacy and dignity of the children and their families, I do not record it in detail in this judgment. I will, however, refer to some characteristics of particular children when I discuss the application of the CEA to the work done by the...

  7. [2010] NZEmpC 67 Porteous v Chief Executive of the Department of Building & Housing [pdf, 104 KB]

    ...position, 23 January 2009, Mr Quigg wrote again to the Department’s solicitors seeking an extension of time to consider the offer. In doing so, he relied principally on an earlier request for information under the Official Information Act and the Privacy Act which had not then been satisfied. The Department responded by extending the time for Mr Porteous to accept the revised offer until 25 February 2009. [32] In early February 2009, a work permit for Mr Porteous was approved by...

  8. [2012] NZEmpC 97 Doran v Crest Commercial Cleaning Ltd [pdf, 224 KB]

    ...agreements. Indeed, somewhat to the contrary, s 69OC(6) requires: (6) Employee transfer costs information provided under this section must be provided— (a) in aggregate form; and (b) to the extent practicable, in a form that protects the privacy of the employees concerned. [59] A further factor affecting this issue is that disclosure may only be sought where the party seeking information is negotiating an agreement, deciding whether to enter into an agreement or tendering f...

  9. Hill - Otakanini Māori Reservation (2015) 108 Taitokerau MB 76 (108 TTK 76) [pdf, 423 KB]

    108 Taitokerau MB 76 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20140009232 A20150003382 UNDER Sections 37(3), 239, 240, 338(7) and 338(8), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 Regulation 3(f), Māori Reservation Regulations 1994 IN THE MATTER OF Otakanini Māori Reservation BETWEEN PEARL HILL Applicant Hearing: 17 February 2015 25 May 2015 8 June 2015 (Heard at Auckland and Whangarei) Judgment: 14 August 20

  10. [2017] NZEnvC 209 Auckland Council v London Pacific Family Trust [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    ...bulk and form that maintains and is in keeping with the character and amenity value of the established residential neighbourhood ... (4) Require the height, bulk and location of development to maintain a reasonable level of sunlight access and privacy and to minimize visual dominance effects to the adjoining sites. [29] We pause at this point to observe that there is clear recognition in these SHZ provisions of the capacity for special character to inform amenity values. That suggests...