Search Results

Search results for privacy.

3011 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 127/2017 EZ v UO [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...13 [Company B] v EZ HC Auckland [citation removed], 18 May 2015 at [8] (emphasis in original). 14 [Company B] v EZ HC Auckland [citation removed, 12 June 2015 at [2]. 14 entitlement to copies under the Privacy Act. If there are ongoing delays on Mr UO’s part, he can expect the matter to be referred to the Law Society. [78] The court then turned its attention to costs. Costs of $6,868 were awarded in favour of the plaintiff, with the provi

  2. Cooper v Standards Committee LCRO 280/2013, 281/2013, 324/2013, 325/2013, 34/2014, 118/2014 (17 April 2015) [pdf, 406 KB]

    ...provides: When deciding whether to publish the identity of a person who is the subject of a censure order, a Standards Committee and the Board must take into account the public interest and, if appropriate, the impact of publication on the interests and privacy of - (a) the complainant; and (b) clients of the censured person; and (c) relatives of the censured person; and (d) partner, employers, and associates of the censured person; and (e) the censured person....

  3. Family Court rewrite submission: Backbone Collective [pdf, 295 KB]

    ...used by the Judge to order unsafe parenting orders. 10 Women are only able to read the psychologists report in their lawyer’s office but not to take notes or take a copy away with them. This provision appears to fly in the face of NZ’s privacy laws and fundamental human rights (and those of most other westernised countries) that give citizens the right to a copy of the information that is held about them and the right to ask for this to be corrected if it is factually inac...

  4. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 (2019) 217 Waiariki MB 85 (217 WAR 85) [pdf, 536 KB]

    ...the time that has elapsed since the communication was made or the information was compiled or prepared; and (ii) the extent to which the information has already been disclosed to other persons; and (g) society’s interest in protecting the privacy of victims of offences and, in particular, victims of sexual offences. (4) The Judge may, in addition to the matters stated in subsection (3), have regard to any other matters that the Judge considers relevant. (5) A Judge may giv...

  5. RIS Criminal Cases Review Commission [pdf, 497 KB]

    ...wrongful convictions undermine the integrity of our criminal justice system. In January and February 2018 Justice officials undertook targeted consultation with the judiciary, investigative bodies (Independent Police Conduct Authority, Office of the Privacy Commissioner and the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security), representative leaders of the law profession, academics and other key stakeholders to test the proposed model for a CCRC. Targeted consultation also included co...

  6. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - discussion document [pdf, 408 KB]

    ...kept confidential because it is sensitive personal information. The Ministry of Justice will take your views into account when responding to such requests. https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/ mailto:humanrights@justice.govt.nz 7 The Privacy Act 2020 governs how the Ministry collects, holds, uses, and discloses personal information about you and the information you provide. You have the right to access and correct personal information. The Ministry will proactively release...

  7. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - discussion document - large print [pdf, 458 KB]

    ...clearly and explain why. For example, you may wish for some information to be kept confidential because it is sensitive personal information. The Ministry of Justice will take your views into account when responding to such requests. Page 7 The Privacy Act 2020 governs how the Ministry collects, holds, uses, and discloses personal information about you and the information you provide. You have the right to access and correct personal information. The Ministry will proactivel...

  8. [2022] NZEnvC 231 Hurupaki Holdings Limited v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 966 KB]

    ...on-site parking located at least 2m from the adjacent legal road boundary. b) Any boundary treatment such as timber fencing to reduce or minimise noise nuisance on neighbouring residential properties. c) Vegetative screening to minimise visual or privacy effects on adjacent properties. d) Location and design of any outdoor lighting. e) Location and design of any signage (either freestanding or located on the proposed building). 8. Prior to the opening and operation of the café, the con...

  9. [2022] NZREADT 1 - DU v Real Estate Agents Authority & DC (1 February 2022) [pdf, 333 KB]

    ...8 Bundle at 353. 9 Bundle at 296. 5 [23] The licensee sent another email to the purchasers on 13 December 2019 at 12:14 pm saying he was waiting to hear from the vendor.10 It was a complex situation which he could not divulge for privacy reasons. The vendor was working through another expression of interest. The communications between the licensee and the purchasers appear to have ended with this email on 13 December with the licensee saying he would make an appointm...

  10. LCRO 200/2020 SK and WP v AQ (27 October 2023) [pdf, 292 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2023] NZLCRO 128 Ref: LCRO 200/2020 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN SK and WP Applicants AND AQ Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been anonymised Introduction [1] The applicants,