3009 items matching your search terms
WXN v AUCKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED [2021] NZEmpC 205 [23 November 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 205 EMPC 356/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a non-publication order BETWEEN WXN Plaintiff AND AUCKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMIT
...pēnā ai. Hei tauira, ka mate koe kia noho tūmataiti ētahi mōhiohio nā te āhuatanga rahirahi o ērā mōhiohio matawhaiaro. Ka whai whakaaro te Tāhū o te Ture ki ō whakaaro ina uruparengia ana ērā tono. He manawhakahaere hoki tō te Privacy Act 2020 mō tā te Tāhū kohikohi, pupuri, whakamahi, whakaputa hoki i te mōhiohio matawhaiaro e pā ana ki a koe, me ngā mōhiohio ka whakaratongia e koe. He mōtika tōu kia uru, kia whakatika hoki i ngā mōhiohio matawhaiaro. K...
...say that this evidenced a prolonged and intimate interaction at a level that can fairly be described as only just short of sexual intercourse. [75] The practitioner indicated that he had not wished to detail the conduct out of concern for the privacy of Ms K. The Standards Committee assert that the practitioner’s attempt to minimise the conduct, which he has now accepted was at least at the level of unsatisfactory conduct, was for his own benefit. 17 [76] Mr Gardner-Ho...
...with out-of-scope information removed. Please note that an online survey of practitioners including prosecutors, defence counsel and registry court staff was carried out. We have included the final survey questions in our response. However, due to privacy reasons, we cannot provide the individual responses. The written results of the survey were in the summary previously provided to you. The Ministry of Justice Focus Group report was carried out by Research First, which was contracted...
...whaiaro ināianei inarā ka taea e te hangarau te whakataurite raraunga me te rauhanga i te tangata. E whakaaro ana mātou me taikaha ake te whakahaere i ngā raraunga rārangi pōti, mā te whakahou i te Ture Pōti kia reretahi ake ki ngā herenga o te Privacy Act 2020. 87. Me mutu te tirotiro ā-tūmatanui me te hoko i ngā rārangi pōti, tae atu ki te whakauru ake ki ngā mōhiohio mō te hunga i pōti, engari me whakaae tonu te āheinga mō ngā take whakahaere petihana pōti me n...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 051 Ref: LCRO 003/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN RP Applicant AND TG Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The applicant, Mrs
...document 7. Some information is out of scope and has not been included and other information has been withheld under the following provisions of the Act: Section 9(2)(a) Section 9(2)(a) Section 9(2)(a)- • section 9(2)(a) to protect privacy of natural persons • section 9(2)(g)(i) to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and frank expression of opinions • section 9(2)(h) to maintain legal professional privilege In withholding information...
...number of serious complaints of harassment against E tū staff, one of whom was Mr Singh. Ms Mackintosh asked HVF to put her complaints in writing, which she did. The email set out a lengthy list of allegations, including defamation, breach of privacy, mental and physical harassment, promoting wrong information and hate speech against HVF’s business, provoking staff against her and causing loss of her business. Various communications were attached, which were said to be copies of...
IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2024] NZIACDT 17 Reference No: IACDT 007/23 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN LB Complainant AND KAY LUV Adviser Hearing at Auckland on 7 May 2024 SUBJECT TO SUPPRESSION ORDER DECISION Dated 23 May 2024 REPR
...provisions of the IPCA Act. Some documents have been refused under 18(d) of the Act, as the information is publicly available. Some information has also been withheld under the following provisions of the Act: • section 9(2)(a) to protect the privacy of natural persons; • section 9(2)(ba)(i) to protect information that is subject to an obligation of confidence; • section 9(2)(f)(iv) to maintain the constitutional conventions for the time being which protect the confident...