Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 237 View West Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...particularly there is a strong prospect that the application may be opposed . ./'StAL"l]f,;:-, by neighbouring owners, given the intrusion into height to boundary setbacks and /(, .. :::.~/ It)~~~ \., consequent adverse effects on their privacy and outlook. ~'1 if<\~~-,{:~{~)/6>\ (~ I ~~ ~ 'f('~~i;<:)l) ~:t:) ~~~:{~ ~" ..... --~.,;' 22 Scope of alternatives [92] This Court has considerable difficulty with the proposed alternative put...

2. LCRO 236/2020 TB - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (13 December 2021) [pdf, 580 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 205 Ref: LCRO 236/2020 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN TB Applicant AND APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF A PROSECUTORIAL DECISION DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been chang

3. [2022] NZEmpC 5 VMR v Civil Aviation Authority [pdf, 519 KB]

   ...that it was agreed the amended Order covered ASOs, as was the form of the process which CAA intended to follow. [49] On 16 July 2021, CAA wrote to each unvaccinated employee to provide details of the amended Order; to provide a copy of a MoH Privacy Statement which applied to each employee since a Border Worker Testing Register was being used to track vaccination status; and to seek each employee’s advice as to whether or not they would be vaccinated. A response was required b...

4. LCRO 40/2023 DG v [Area] Standards Committee [X] (13 March 2024) [pdf, 497 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 162 Ref: LCRO 40/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING an application for review of a prosecutorial decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN DG Applicant AND [AREA] STANDARDS COMMITTEE [X] Respondent REISSUED DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision ha

5. LCRO 154/2023 FH and NH v WA, BF and DT Limited (28 February 2024) [pdf, 347 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 013 Ref: LCRO 154/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN FH and NH Applicants AND WA, BF and DT LIMITED Respondents DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introd

6. OIA-118936.pdf [pdf, 3.3 MB]

   ...refer to Appendix 1, which details the documents identified in scope of your request and my decision on their release. Please note that some information has been withheld under the following sections of the Act: • section 9(2)(a) - to protect privacy of natural persons. • section 9(2)(f)(iv) - to maintain the constitutional conventions that protect confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers and officials; and • section 9(2)(h) - to maintain legal professional privilege....

7. McElroy & Ors as Trustees of the Shona and Roger McElroy Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 284 KB]

   UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN SHONA KAY McELROY, ROGER IAN McELROY and RUSSELL STUART MELVILLE as Trustees of the Shona and Roger McElroy Family Trust Claimants AND No First or Second Respondents AND STEPHEN BRIAN LAY Third Respondent AND JESSOP TOWNSEND LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WATERPROOFING LIMITED (in Liquidation

8. Eichelbaum report [pdf, 441 KB]

   1 I N D E X 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction 2.1 Children’s names 2.2 Background 2.3 The Investigation 2.4 The charges 2.5 Depositions 2.6 In the High Court 2.7 The trial 2.8 The 1994 Appeal 2.9 The 1999 Appeal 3. The Ministerial Inquiry 3.1 The Terms of Reference 3.2 Interpretation 4. Process 4.1 Representation of parents 4.2 Appointment of Experts 4.3 The Regulat

9. 0323323-Ministry-of-Justice_National-Panui-May-2023-PROOF.pdf [pdf, 823 KB]

   ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz MAY | HARATUA 2023 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confirmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more information, please contact your local Mäori Land Court office. Individual

10. [2014] NZEmpC 189 H v A Ltd [pdf, 349 KB]

    H v A Ltd NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 189 [7 October 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 189 ARC 27/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN H Plaintiff AND A Ltd Defendant Hearing: 13, 14 and 15 August 2014 (heard at Auckland) Appearances: R Harrison QC and C Abaffy, counsel for the plaintiff P Caisley, counsel for the defendant Jud