3009 items matching your search terms
KEANU HEAD v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE INLAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT [2021] NZEmpC 69 [14 May 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZEmpC 69 EMPC 254/2019 IN THE MATTER OF an application for declarations pursuant to s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN KEANU HEAD First Plaintiff AND JAMES LOGIE WRIGHT Second Plaintiff AND SAMUEL
In confidence Office of the Minister of Justice ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTERING FINANCING OF TERRORISM REFORMS: PHASE II Proposal 1. Further to the decision to pass legislation implementing the second phase of the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) reforms, this paper: a. Outlines benefits and anticipated costs of the reforms; b. Provides an overview of the feedback on key issues received by the Ministry of Justice during consultat
...In addition, the proposed planting relies on subdivision to occur first, which requires resource consent.60 We note that much of the proposed planting largely follows along the proposed accessways, although some hedging is proposed to provide privacy between building platforms, and these are to be no more than 2.5m tall. We consider that the form and location of shelter belt planting is quite dissimilar to what is proposed for landscaping on this site. That difference means that...
TARGETED ENGAGEMENT: ADOPTION LAW REFORM REPORT Final Report Hāpaitia te ara tika pūmau ai te rangatiratanga mō ngā uri whakatipu. Foster the pathway of knowledge to strength, independence, and growth for future generations. 8 December 2021 Commercial In Confidence CONTENTS Preface 7 Dedication page 1 Introduction and Background 2 Aotearoa New Zealand’s adoption laws no longer reflect our society’s values, cultural expectations, or international best practice 2
Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice Options for prohibiting conversion practices Date 18 March 2021 File reference HUM-18-01 Action sought Timeframe Indicate your preferred policy options 22 March 2021 Contacts for telephone discussion (if required) Name Position Telephone First contact (work) (a/h) Caroline Greaney General Manager, Civil and Constitutional 04 918 858 Jenna Reid Policy Manager, Civil Law and Human Rights 04 9 8 86 9 Senior Policy Advisor Minist
...and the Ministry, please refer to table 1 below which details the documents in scope of your request and my decision on their release. Some information has been withheld under the following provisions of the Act: • section 9(2)(a) to protect privacy of natural persons, • section 9(2)(f)(iv) to maintain the constitutional conventions that protect confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers and officials, • section 9(2)(g)(i) to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 070 Ref: LCRO 11/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN GD and CZ Applicants AND BO Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr GD (f
Minute: Inquiry into the deaths of Dr Tamara Cvetanova and others IN THE CORONERS COURTAT CHRISTCHURCH MINUTE OF CORONER G MATENGA INQUIRY INTO THE DEATHS OF Dr TAMARA CVETANOVA AND OTHERS [1] Following the release of my Findings dated 25 March 2014 ("the Findings") in respect of this inquiry, Ms Smith, Solicitor for NZFS brought to my attention via Memorandum dated 27 March 2014, some typographical errors which she asked to be corrected. Although there is no specific power in the Coroners Act 2
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 123 Ref: LCRO 64/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN VA Applicant AND JL Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant,
Speaking about cultural background at sentencing Section 16 of the Criminal Justice Act 1985 Alison Chetwin Tony Waldegrave Kiri Simonsen with Strategic Training and Development Services & The Family Centre Social Policy Research Unit ii First published in November 2000 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand © Crown Copyright ISBN 0-478-20155-9 (Printed) iii Foreword The Criminal Justice Act, which came into force on 1 October 1985, brought about a