Search Results

Search results for privacy.

2938 items matching your search terms

  1. Waxman v Pal [2016] NZHRRT 28 [pdf, 71 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2016] NZHRRT 28 Reference No. HRRT 035/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DEBORAH WAXMAN PLAINTIFF AND JITENDRA PAL DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Dr D Waxman in person Dr J Pal in person DATE OF HEARING: 30 and 31 May 2016 DATE OF DECISION: 11 August 2016 DECISION OF TRI...

  2. Yiasoumi v Attorney-General [2017] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 242 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 12 Reference No. HRRT 061/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN YIASOUMI YIASOUMI PLAINTIFF AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Y Yiasoumi in person Ms H Carrad for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 8 March 2017 DATE OF DECISION: 11 April...

  3. Enforcement of Access Direction (s104) [pdf, 223 KB]

    ...details too. If your representative is not a lawyer, you need to give him or her the authority to act on your behalf. THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Enforcement of access direction Before you continue Please tick to confirm the following: The Privacy Commissioner has issued an access direction against the agency. The agency has not complied with the access direction or has not complied in full. The agency has not lodged an appeal within 20 working days from the date of the not...

  4. [2023] NZEmpC 15 Pilgrim v The Attorney-General [pdf, 182 KB]

    ...(subject to conditions, such as in respect of restrictions on filming, photographing or recording certain individuals during the course of the view). [3] The Gloriavale defendants’ opposition to the application is predominantly focussed on privacy concerns. They note that Gloriavale is home for around 580 people, including around 350 children under 15 years of age, and say that filming the Community, living quarters, or people involved in the proceedings would represent an unwa...

  5. 2023 July Family Violence Provider Update.pdf [pdf, 141 KB]

    ...submit an FVPP04 to the court (dvprogrammes) within 7 days. Please note: You cannot non-comply (FVPP04) and close a participant for non-attendance to an NVP support session unless the support session date was specifically noted in the FVPP02A. Privacy Assessments This year’s privacy self-assessment checklist was due 30 June 2023. If you have not completed this already please send a copy to your contract manager. The security self-assessment template can be found in the link...

  6. [2025] NZEmpC 150 Courage and Pilgrim v The Attorney General [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...that the Attorney-General (first respondent in these proceedings) disclose a full copy of documents referred to in the Attorney-General’s statement of defence. [8] It is common ground that the documents contain personal information and that privacy concerns will need to be addressed. While a redacted copy of the document 1 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [2023] NZEmpC 105, [2023] ERNZ 454; Courage v Attorney- General [2022] NZEmpC 77, (2022) 18 NZELR 746. 2 Pilgrim v Attorney-G...

  7. Fehling v Appleby (Recusal Application) [2014] NZHRRT 11 [pdf, 65 KB]

    ...Westland Area School [2012] NZHRRT 15 (6 July 2012). Background [3] On 7 May 2012 a panel of the Tribunal comprising Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson, Ms J Grant MNZM, Member and Ms S Scott, Member heard proceedings brought by Mr Fehling under the Privacy Act 1993 against the South Westland Area School. At the 2 relevant time Mr Appleby was the chairperson of the board of trustees of the school and he attended the hearing held at Hokitika. He did not give evidence. His role app...

  8. Rafiq v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Costs) [2013] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 36 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 32 Reference No. HRRT 037/2011, 038/2011 & 039/2011 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY THE DEFENDANT FOR COSTS BETWEEN RAZDAN RAFIQ PLAINTIFF AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey, Member Dr AD Trlin, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr R Rafi...

  9. BORA Taxation (Annual Rates for 2015-16, Research and Development, and Remedial Matters) Bill [pdf, 312 KB]

    ...those tax secrecy provisions. We consider, however, the broader information sharing powers are commensurate with the greater public interest in efficiently detecting and prosecuting serious crime. The general public’s reasonable expectations of privacy, which underlie section 21 of the Bill of Rights Act, [3] must be considered in the context of the public interest in combating crime and the general trend toward information sharing between government agencies. 20. AISAs must specif...

  10. Koyama v New Zealand Law Society (Application by Defendant for Costs) [2013] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 64 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 22 Reference No. HRRT 030/2009 & 031/2009 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 AND UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY THE DEFENDANT FOR COSTS BETWEEN TATSUHIKO KOYAMA PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr RK Musuku, Member Mr BK Neeson, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Koyama in person Mr...