Search Results

1. [2019] NZEmpC 9 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 351 KB]

   ...application was dismissed as a fishing expedition searching for information and material in the context of unrelated proceedings to which the defendant, LSG Sky Chefs, happened to be a party. The Court took into account as relevant considerations the privacy of the parties. [7] The defendant opposed AWU’s application on two bases. First, because the President of AWU is Mr Matsuoka, on whose behalf the earlier application was made. The defendant’s position was that this appl...

2. [2013] NZEmpC 197 Electrical Union 2001 Inc and Anor v Mighty River Power [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...which is incorporated into cl 32.1, provides: “Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment.” [11] Particularly relevant to the decision of this challenge is cl 37 of the collective agreement which states as follows: Privacy The principles of the Privacy Act 1993 (The Privacy Act) will apply; With the employee consent (on a case by case basis), the employer may collect and retain personal information, concerning the [employee’s] employment, directly...

3. Timmo v ICL NZ Limited (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 23 [pdf, 142 KB]

   Reference No. HRRT 018/2021 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN WILLIAM CARRICK TIMMO PLAINTIFF AND ICL NZ LIMITED FIRST DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms K Anderson, Deputy Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey, MNZM Member Ms SP Stewart, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr WC Timmo (in person) Mr J Cox for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 17 August 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT THE CLAIM1 [1] Mr Timmo’s claim is an Information Privacy Prin...

4. Fast dispute resolution: public consultation privacy information

   ...Your submission is subject to the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). If your feedback is within scope of an OIA request for information, the Ministry is required to release the information unless one of the withholding grounds of the OIA apply. The Privacy Act Your submission is subject to the Privacy Act 2020 as it governs how the Ministry collects and uses personal information. Your rightsYou have the right to ask the Ministry: for access to your personal information, to make corrections t...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Key initiatives >
   3. New private statutory adjudication process for civil disputes

5. Beattie v Official Assignee [2021] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...PROHIBITING RELEASE OF UNREDACTED DECISION TO PERSONS OTHER THAN THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE. (2) PERMANENT ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL. Reference No. HRRT 087/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN IAN BEATTIE PLAINTIFF AND OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms BL Klippel, Member Mr M Koloamatangi, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr I Beattie in p...

6. BORA Land Transport (Enforcement Powers) Amendment Bill [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...influence in New Zealand caselaw: 7.1. In Quebec (Attorney-General) v Laroche [2002] 3 SCR 708, [53], the Supreme Court of Canada approved the proposition that:[2] “The prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure is designed to promote privacy interests and not property rights. ... Specifically, where property is taken by government action for reasons other than administrative or criminal investigation a ‘seizure’ under the Charter has not occurred. ... A detention of prop...

7. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Slater (Adjournment) [2014] NZHRRT 53 [pdf, 48 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 53 Reference No. HRRT 036/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN THE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND CAMERON JOHN SLATER DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr SRG Judd for plaintiff Mr CJ Slater in person DATE OF HEARING: 28 and 29 October 2014 DATE OF MI...

8. [2024] NZEmpC 171 Lanigan v Fonterra Brands (New Zealand) Ltd (Interlocutory (No 3) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...T Oldfield, counsel for first plaintiffs P Cranney, counsel for second plaintiff M Dew KC and R Rendle, counsel for defendant G Iddamalgoda, counsel for the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions as intervener I Clarke and S Cates, counsel for Privacy Foundation New Zealand Inc as intervener Judgment: 9 September 2024 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 3) OF JUDGE M S KING (Application to appoint a Court expert) (Application to participate at a hearing via audio-visual...

9. Legal aid review public consultation privacy information

   ...Your submission is subject to the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). If your feedback is within scope of an OIA request for information, the Ministry is required to release the information unless one of the withholding grounds of the OIA apply. The Privacy Act Your submission is subject to the Privacy Act 2020 as it governs how the Ministry collects and uses personal information. Your rights You have the rights to ask the Ministry: for access to your personal information to make corrections...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Key initiatives >
   3. Legal aid scheme review

10. Compliance assurance and auditing policy 7 May 2021 [pdf, 278 KB]

    ...checks Purpose of compliance assurance checks The purpose of compliance assurance checks is to ensure that Customers are compliant with: • the Customer’s Contract with the Ministry (including the CCH Check User Guide) • the Ministry’s privacy, confidentiality and security requirements, and • the Privacy Act 2020 and any other applicable legislation, principles, industry codes and policies in relation to data that is personal information. Compliance assurance checks enable...