Search Results

1. HRRT-Position-description-Deputy-Chair-1December 2022 [docx, 25 KB]

   ...commitment: Full-time Term: Up to 5 years Remuneration: $858 per day (annualised and is neither a salary nor wages) The Tribunal The Human Rights Review Tribunal hears and determines proceedings lodged pursuant to the Human Rights Act 1993 (the Act), the Privacy Act 2020 and the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 after complaints have first been dealt with by the Human Rights Commission, the Privacy Commissioner and the Health and Disability Commissioner pursuant to their resp...

2. About the OIA

   ...your right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman. There are several interests that may lead to a refusal, including: maintenance of the law effective conduct of public affairs disclosure of trade secrets and commercial sensitivity impact on personal privacy information requested is or will soon be publicly available. Review You can complain to the Ombudsman if: you are refused access to information your request is not answered within the time limit you are charged an unreasonable fee. If the...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Official Information Act requests

3. MOJ-Privacy-Guidelines - conflict of interest template [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...exist? Actual Potential Perceived No Conflict Comments Actions taken: Restricting Involvement Reallocating Responsibility Removing the conflict Relinquishing the work Please answer the following questions: 1. Has a privacy breach occurred? Note if the answer is Yes, privacy breach procedures must be followed. 2. Does the Court or Ministry of Justice need to be informed? The Ministry of Justice requires that you document the steps you have taken, and...

4. BORA Immigration Amendment Bill (No 2) [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...and shoulders, the person’s fingerprints and iris scan. Because the obligation to allow the collection of biometric information involves compulsory access to information, including personal information, it impinges upon reasonable expectations of privacy that members of the public would have in relation to that information. However, for the reasons below we conclude that the power to require biometric information is not unreasonable. 20.The Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employm...

5. FINAL-Summary-of-Consultation-Political-Donations.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...may incur additional costs for the parties, may decrease compliance and therefore integrity in reporting. One submitter suggested additional resources should be provided to candidates and parties to help support compliance. Some submitters raised privacy concerns about the disclosure of candidates’ financial positions In relation to the disclosure of candidate loans, some submitters raised privacy concerns around the candidate’s financial position being publicly disclosed. A few subm...

6. Director of Proceedings v Xu [2023] NZHRRT 30 [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...has breached the Health and Disability Commissioner (Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights) Regulations 1996 (“the Code”) in respect of: (i) Right 1(2) by failing to take adequate steps to respect the aggrieved person’s privacy; and (ii) Right 4(2) by failing to provide services to the aggrieved person that complied with legal, professional, ethical, and other relevant standards; and (ii) Right 6(1) by failing to provide information to the aggrieved person t...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 145 AARTS v Barnardos NZ and Ors [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...Authority BETWEEN JOHAN AARTS Plaintiff AND BARNARDOS NEW ZEALAND First Defendant AND COMMISSIONER OF NEW ZEALAND POLICE Second Defendant AND MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Third Defendant AND THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER Fourth Defendant AND THE OMBUDSMAN Fifth Defendant AND MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Sixth Defendant AND THE SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE Seventh Defendant AND THE DIRECTOR OF...

8. Geary v ACC (Application for Stay of Order) [2013] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 49 KB]

   ...EFG AND JKL (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 37 Reference No. HRRT 001/2012 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN IAN RUSSELL GEARY PLAINTIFF AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr MJM Keefe JP, Member Dr AD Trlin, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr AC...

9. [2022] NZEmpC 80 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...proceedings without the disclosure of any more information about the private lives of individuals, or matters that are commercially sensitive, than is necessary to satisfy the principle of open justice: (d) the protection of other confidentiality and privacy interests (including those of children and other vulnerable members of the community) and any privilege held by, or available to, any person: 2 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [2017] NZEmpC 160 at [4]. 3 Erceg v...

10. PAUP Residential Alternative height in relation to boundary [pdf, 632 KB]

    ...efficient use of the site by providing design flexibility at fIrst floor of where a dwelling building is located close to the street frontage, while maintaining a reasonable level of sunlight access and minimising ¥isool domiaanee overlooking and privacy effects to immediate neighbours. d) Amend 4.8 Assessment - restricted discretionary activities as follows: H4.8.1. Matters of discretion The Council will restrict its discretion to all of the following matters when assessing a restri...