Search Results

1. [2020] NZREADT 04 - Singh - Ruling regarding release of file (20 February 2020) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...[17] The Tribunal is not listed as being subject to the Official Information Act 1982, either by way of Schedule 1 to that Act, or by way of Part 1 or Part 2 of the Ombudsmen Act 1975. The Tribunal is expressly excluded from the provisions of the Privacy Act 1993 by virtue of s 2(1)(viii) of that Act (definition of “agency”). [18] Counsel for Mr Govindarajan and Mr Singh have made submissions as to the approach the Tribunal should take to the application. Submissions [19] Ms...

2. Directory of Official Information Search Tool

   ...OIA Servi corporate and finance - deputy chief executive stewart mcrobie we enable the organisation through the provision of strategic and operational advice and support across acc we oversee all our technical corporate functions across finance legal privacy and ethics risk and assurance actuarial procurement property and sustainability investments - chief investments officer paul dyer we provide support to the investment fixed interest and direct market teams while ensuring the safe-keeping of...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Directory of Official Information

3. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bill [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...8. Section 21 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure, whether of the person, property, correspondence or otherwise. The right protects a number of values including personal privacy, dignity, and property.1 The Bill engages s 21 with respect to its information gathering powers and with respect to searches and seizures authorised within the Bank’s currency regulation role. Information gathering powers 9. Clause...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 68 KAQ v Attorney-General [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...proceedings without the disclosure of any more information about the private lives of individuals, or matters that are commercially sensitive, than is necessary to satisfy the principle of open justice: (d) the protection of other confidentiality and privacy interests 5 Rule 11(7)(a). 6 Rule 11(8). 7 Erceg v Erceg [2016] NZSC 135, [2017] 1 NZLR 310 at [2]; Commissioner of Police v Doyle [2017] NZHC 3049; and Berry v Crimson Consulting Ltd [2017] NZHC 3026 upheld on appeal...

5. Regulatory Impact Statement Privacy Act Reform [pdf, 882 KB]

6. BORA Health and Safety Reform Bill [pdf, 291 KB]

   ...constituting a “search or seizure” that are “unreasonable” in the circumstances. A request for information or documents constitutes a search for the purposes of s 21. 1 7. The Court of Appeal stated that the main aim of s 21 is to protect privacy interests 2: It is only where a person's reasonable expectations of privacy have been breached that a personal remedy under the Bill of Rights ... is available. The reasonable expectation of privacy enjoyed by a person is to b...

7. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Attorney-General (Application for Non-Publication Orders) [2017] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...STEP-DAUGHTER (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 6 Reference No. HRRT 091/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Mr R Kee, Director of Human Rights P...

8. Mullane v Attorney-General (Request for Transcript) [2021] NZHRRT 31 [pdf, 143 KB]

   1 (1) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON Reference No. HRRT 011/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN BRIAN GREGORY MULLANE PLAINTIFF AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Mr BG Mullane in person DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 13 July 2021 DECISION OF CHAIRPERSON ON REQUEST BY PLAINT...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 105 TPT Forests Ltd v Stronge [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...information regarding the conduct of identified individuals, including Mr Penfold and Mr Stronge, and TPT’s China-based employees. It says the affidavits also contain serious, yet disputed and untested allegations, and that they would impact on the privacy of current and/or former employees of TPT and current and former clients (and their officers and representatives) of TPT.2 [10] TPT says that there is no overriding general public interest permitting release of the documents....

10. 2022 NZPSPLA 027.pdf [pdf, 119 KB]

    ...Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 against AVISHEK MAHARAJ HEARD in person at Auckland on 8 August 2022 DECISION [1] A complaint of misconduct was made against Avishek Maharaj alleging he had breached privacy and security requirements while working as a security technician at the University of Auckland. [2] I referred the complaint to the Complaints, Investigation and Prosecution Unit (CIPU) for investigation. CIPU found that the foll...