2939 items matching your search terms
...AUCKLAND DISTRICT LAW SOCIETY INCORPORATED Intervener AND THE NEW ZEALAND BAR ASSOCIATION (NGĀ AHORANGI MOTUHAKE O TE TURA) Intervener AND THE EMPLOYMENT LAW INSTITUTE OF NZ INCORPORATED Intervener AND THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER Intervener Hearing: On the papers Appearances: A Mapu, advocate for plaintiff S Greening and K Hudson, counsel for defendant (granted leave to withdraw) A Toohey, counsel...
...proceedings without the disclosure of any more information about the private lives of individuals, or matters that are commercially sensitive, than is necessary to satisfy the principle of open justice; the protection of other confidentiality and privacy interests (including those of children and other vulnerable members of the community); the principle of open justice (including the 1 Applied via reg 6 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000 and/or by way of helpful analogy....
...family violence a provision that family violence agencies must consider sharing information in certain circumstances, and in exercising their judgement must apply the principle that victims’ safety takes precedence over confidentiality and privacy, and a good faith immunity for anyone who shares personal information under the information sharing provisions in family violence legislation. Existing mechanisms will continue to be used to deal with poor information sharing practi...
...family violence a provision that family violence agencies must consider sharing information in certain circumstances, and in exercising their judgement must apply the principle that victims’ safety takes precedence over confidentiality and privacy, and a good faith immunity for anyone who shares personal information under the information sharing provisions in family violence legislation. Existing mechanisms will continue to be used to deal with poor information sharing practi...
...Section 21 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure, whether of the person, their property or correspondence, or otherwise. The right protects a number of values including personal privacy, dignity, and property. 5 19. The Privy Council in New Zealand Stock Exchange v CIR was “content to assume” 6 that the Commissioner of Inland Revenue was conducting a search, for the purposes of s 21, when requesting infor...
...9. Section 21 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure, whether of the person, property, correspondence or otherwise. The right protects a number of values including personal privacy, dignity, and property.2 10. Ordinarily a provision found to limit a particular right or freedom may nevertheless be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act if it can be considered reasonably justified in terms of s 5 of that Act. Howev...
...foster consistency of practice in forensic court liaison nurses throughout New Zealand. Note: An order under section 74 of the Coroners Act 2006 prohibits the publication of diary notes made by Christie Marceau in the interests of personal privacy. Self-inflicted Jolly [2018] NZCorC 1 (10 January 2018) CIRCUMSTANCES Benjamin William Jolly of Wanaka died of self-inflicted injuries. RECOMMENDATIONS OF CORONER A J TUTTON I. I make the following recommendations pursuant t...
...for her staff to copy the files. Ms QO says that although by then the file ran to around 20,000 pages, she decided against sending them to a commercial copier outside the firm. Ms QO considered that attracted an unacceptable risk to Mrs MN’s privacy. She knew Mrs MN was very sensitive about her privacy and she did not know if or how Mrs MN’s privacy would be protected if she was not holding the materials. [17] Various members of the firm’s support staff photocopied Mrs MN...
...hearing, both in Mr Barron’s cross-examination of Mr Goel and in his closing address, Mr Barron again apologised to Mr Goel. [71] In relation to the relevance of an apology a materially similar provision to HRA, s 92I(4) exists in s 102(3) of the Privacy Act 2020 and in s 85(4) of the Privacy Act 1993. In considering the relevance of an apology under s 85(4), the Tribunal in Williams v Accident Compensation Corporation [2017] NZHRRT 26 said: [38] An appropriate and timely apology ca...
...interpreter must tell the Central Registry if they are contacted by anyone about a case. The Ministry will investigate the matter and respond as appropriate. Interpreters and Language Service Providers (LSPs) must act in accordance with the Ministry’s Privacy Guidelines for Justice Providers, the Privacy Act 2020, and any other relevant obligations. The Ministry’s Privacy Guidelines for providers of Justice Services is a useful resource to help interpreters manage information in a...