Search Results

1. Badillo-Lopez v Uber New Zealand (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 18 [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...25 April 2016, Mr Badillo-Lopez emailed Uber New Zealand and requested all information it held about him. Later, he made a complaint to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) against Uber New Zealand. On 10 November 2016, a Certificate of Investigation was issued which records that the OPC investigated Mr Badillo-Lopez’s complaint under Principle 6 and found a breach of that Principle. [7] On 15 February 2017, Mr Badillo-Lopez filed a claim in the Tribunal against Uber New Ze...

2. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - summary record 5th report [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...working as intended. The police force was committed to mitigating any negative or disproportionate effects felt by the affected community and New Zealand’s Commissioner of Police had engaged personally with the community in the aftermath of the investigation. Lessons had been learned, and would continue to be learned. CCPR/C/SR.2696 5 10-27115 22. Moving on to question 9, he said that the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 had been enacted during the current reporting period. I...

3. [2009] NZEmpC AC 44/09 Ecocover (NZ) Ltd & Anor v Dunn [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...claims against him personally but it was only on the day of the Authority’s meeting and at the prompting of the Authority Member that these claims against Mr Cruickshank were withdrawn. Unfortunately there is no transcript of the Authority’s investigation meeting and the matter is not dealt with expressly in the Authority’s substantive determination issued on 14 July 2009 (AA 230/09). The outcome was described by the Authority in its costs determination as a withdrawal of th...

4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - government reply to issues 6th report [pdf, 624 KB]

   New Zealand’s sixth periodic report under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 General information on the national human rights situation, including new measures and developments relating to the implementation of the Covenant (Issues

5. LA Audit Report 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 [pdf, 401 KB]

   ...recording .................................................................................................................16 Privacy concerns .............................................................................................................17 Private payments .............................................................................................................18 Protecting the Commissioner’s interests ......................................................................

6. HT v SE [2020] NZDT 1397 (15 May 2020) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

7. BW v NK [2024] NZDT 27 (19 February 2024) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pro...

8. KX v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 803 (17 September 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pro...

9. S Ltd v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 850 (14 November 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pro...

10. [2019] NZREADT 48 - Thomson v CAC520 & Foote (7 November 2019) [pdf, 183 KB]

    ...over hers, even when the detail “was of no consequence such as whether there was a moving van or a waste bin” at the property. She further submitted that the Committee made errors in interpretation and errors of fact. She submitted that the Investigator’s report to the Committee contained several errors, and these were repeated in the Committee’s decision. Ms Thomson further submitted that the Committee did not offer her an opportunity to be heard, which might have led to...