Search Results

1. FQ v EB [2023] NZDT 777 (6 November 2023) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

2. Incorporated Societies Bill.pdf [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...note that the Registrar’s search powers appear to be primarily aimed at ensuring compliance with the regulatory requirements of the Bill. However, to the extent that a search may relate to information that is, or could be, relevant to a criminal investigation, clause 236(4) provides additional safeguards to individuals in that every person has the same privileges in relation to producing relevant documents as witnesses have in proceedings before a court. 28. On this basis, we consider...

3. OIA-102463.pdf [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...2022. These offences apply to everyone, including those involved in the political system, such as members of parliament and local council employees. The Serious Fraud Office and anti-corruption work The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) is mandated to investigate and prosecute serious or complex fraud, including bribery and corruption crimes that could undermine confidence in the public sector or are of significant public interest. Charges that may be filed include charges under the Secret...

4. ID v SN [2024] NZDT 171 (18 April 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

5. [2014] NZEmpC 33 Fox v Hereworth School Trust Board No 3 Interlocutory [pdf, 120 KB]

   ...that only documents relevant to the proceeding need be disclosed, it is difficult to imagine how ACL may have any documents relating to Mrs Fox which are not relevant to the issues in the proceedings between the parties. Although ACL trades as a private investigator, debt collector, and in a number of allied fields, there is no suggestion that it has dealt with Mrs Fox or has had any dealings about her other than those which resulted from the defendant’s request to it to undertak...

6. Nigel-Hampton-and-Kathryn-Dalziel-Submissions.pdf [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...Rights Commission has an important role to play in the Inquiry, including this phase of the Inquiry. All counsel acting for families have raised human rights issues which need to be fully considered including ensuring that there is a rights compliant investigation into the deaths of the Shaheed (see Wallace1). The families support the Human Right Commission being enabled to make oral submissions at the Scope Hearing. 6. Following on from the above, critical to this stage of the Inquir...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 155 Clark v Idea Services Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...13 March 2009. This concerned what S considered was an inadequate response from a CSM about an issue of S’s daughter’s bank account. S then made reference to a previous complaint that S had made about the service of a CSW which had been investigated several months previously by a CSM and was overseen by Mr Clark. Mr Clark had sent S a detailed email in February 2009 about the way in which S’s initial complaint had been dealt and the outcome, that no action would be taken a...

8. CD v EF LCRO 272/2014 (24 September 2015) [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...of discretion, it is appropriate for the LCRO to exercise particular caution before substituting her own judgment for that of the Standards Committee, without good reason.4 Scope of Review [21] The LCRO has broad powers to conduct her own investigations, including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator, and seek and receive evidence. The statutory power of review is much broader than an appeal, and gives the LCRO dis...

9. MOJ0342.2-Homicide-factsheet-FEB22-PRINT.pdf [pdf, 689 KB]

   ...go to victimsinfo.govt.nz If you believe your rights haven’t been met, or you haven’t received the standard of service you expect, you can make a complaint. Go to victimsinfo.govt.nz or call the Victims Information Line on 0800 650 654. The investigation A homicide investigation is very difficult for the family and friends of the victim. If someone in your family or whānau has been a victim of homicide, getting the right support is very important. The Police will assign a victi...

10. MOJ0344.2-factsheet-Affected-by-crime-Nov21-PRINT.pdf [pdf, 654 KB]

    ...go to victimsinfo.govt.nz If you believe your rights haven’t been met, or you haven’t received the standard of service you expect, you can make a complaint. Go to victimsinfo.govt.nz or call the Victims Information Line on 0800 650 654. The investigation A homicide investigation is very difficult for the family and friends of the victim. If someone in your family or whānau has been a victim of homicide, getting the right support is very important. The Police will assign a victi...