Search Results

1. [2017] NZEmpC 128 ALA v ITE [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...is broad and intended to be capable of application to a wide range of circumstances, without any stated limitations. Indeed, the Act reflects Parliament’s recognition of the wide variety of employment relationship participants, for example, private and public companies, local authorities, charities, religious organisations or any other employer or employee whether in the private or public sector. [56] That said, the Court has the ability to determine in a particular case whethe...

2. Complaints Assessment Committee (CAC 403) v Licensee B [2017] NZREADT 1 [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...[39] We have difficulty understanding the relevance of this submission, but we reject any suggestion that we should draw an adverse inference when assessing Ms A’s evidence, from the timing of her statement. Her statement to the Authority’s investigator is dated 22 February 2015. It was within a very short period of her resignation, and Mr W’s complaint. Ms A was consistent in her complaint to Mr W, her statement to the investigator, and her evidence at the hearing. Compari...

3. [2021] NZREADT 23 - Baker v Real Estate Agents Authority (18 May 2021) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...of $603,000 (later reduced by agreement to $602,750) the same day. [6] The appellants complained to the Authority on 8 March 2018 about a number of aspects of Mr Drumm’s conduct in marketing the property. Complaints Assessment Committee 416 investigated the complaint and in a decision dated 19 December 2018 decided to take no further action on it. The appellants appealed to the Tribunal, and in a decision issued on 12 August 2019, the Tribunal referred the complaint back for fres...

4. Rec-Recap-2024-Q1-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 873 KB]

   ...look after navigation safety in the region and it has a Navigation Safety Bylaw for regulating boating activity on the water, but it gives no jurisdiction on the land. The stakeholders in this area with an interest in this location include the private landowner/s and Waikato-Tainui (Iwi). VIII. For there to be appropriate signage and PRE placed at Crayfish Point the stakeholders will need to consult and discuss the placement and the cost. IX. On 22 February 2024, I attended a hu...

5. Briggs v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 413), Eggers & Knott [2017] NZREADT 81 [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...vendor agreed to sell. The listing appraisal put the price at $700,000 and in the view of the agents the likely range for sale was $680,000 to $750,000. [6] Neither agent was involved in the on-sale process. Mr Gibbons said that he told the investigator that after signing the agreement with Mr Briggs he had spent funds on completing the property, tidying up and making improvements to the property, providing a land survey for some potential development and increasing the rent rol...

6. UH v EN [2022] NZDT 155 (13 October 2022) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

7. WD v HT [2023] NZDT 674 (1 November 2023) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

8. KI v CT [2023] NZDT 125 (13 June 2023) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

9. UM v QO [2022] NZDT 252 (12 December 2022) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

10. TT v D Ltd & TC [2024] NZDT 488 (25 June 2024) [pdf, 171 KB]

    ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...