Search Results

1. Directory of Official Information J-L [pdf, 792 KB]

   ...Liability Act 1962 • Official Information Act 1982 • Ombudsmen Act 1975 • Parole Act 20028 • Perpetuities Act 1964 • Political Disabilities Removal Act 1960 • Prisoners’ and Victims’ Claims Act 2005 • Privacy Act 1993 • Private International Law (Choice of Law in Tort) Act 2017 • Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 20109 • Prohibition of Gang Insignia in Government Premises Act 2013 • Property (Relationships) Act 1976 •...

2. Directory of Official Information J-L [pdf, 775 KB]

   ...Liability Act 1962 • Official Information Act 1982 • Ombudsmen Act 1975 • Parole Act 20028 • Perpetuities Act 1964 • Political Disabilities Removal Act 1960 • Prisoners’ and Victims’ Claims Act 2005 • Privacy Act 1993 • Private International Law (Choice of Law in Tort) Act 2017 • Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 20109 • Prohibition of Gang Insignia in Government Premises Act 2013 • Property (Relationships) Act 1976 •...

3. OIA-123766.pdf [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...estate is commonly used by criminals to launder funds, and that CDD on all new customers is a key component of recommendation 22 of the FATF, we do not recommend removing the requirement for real estate agents to conduct CDD. 12. However, officials are investigating opportunities to reduce unnecessary duplication of CDD. The AML/CFT legislative reform work programme will make several amendments to current CDD requirements to make them more risk-based and to provide regulatory relief to th...

4. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Hart [2011] NZLCDT 36 [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...“(i) It was unlawful and unreasonable for the CC2 to undertake an own motion investigation based on privileged information. (ii) The resolution allegedly made by CC2 on 14 October 2008 was invalid, and failure to comply with it cannot properly be investigated. (iii) Even if the resolution of 14 October 2008 was valid which is not admitted, it was unlawful and unreasonable for CC2 to require production of confidential and/or privileged material. (iv) Even if the resolution of 14 Octo...

5. Turner v Itchyfoot Pty Ltd [2021] NZHRRT 27 [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...application of this definition was extensively considered in Taylor v Corrections [2018] NZHRRT 35 (Taylor v Corrections). In that decision, the Tribunal held that personal information was not limited to that which was particularly sensitive, intimate or private. While broad, the Tribunal said the definition is not without limits. A key limit is the requirement that the information be “about” a particular individual. The Tribunal further held that there is no bright line test by wh...

6. LCRO 77/2015 EAB v FBC (7 July 2017) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader tha...

7. Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Taia [2020] NZLCDT 39 (1 December 2020) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...RE PENALTY [1] This decision follows a penalty hearing. Mr Taia admitted all three charges. One is unsatisfactory conduct for failing to rectify an e-dealing issue in a timely manner. Another is misconduct by failing to comply with an investigator’s request for access to a client’s file. The third is misconduct by failing to comply with a costs order. [2] Mr Taia did not attend the hearing. We have taken his written submissions into account. He does not oppose the...

8. C Ltd v Q Ltd & D Ltd [2023] NZDT 289 (27 July 2023) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pro...

9. [2015] NZEnvC 191 Tram Lease v Auckland Transport and Auckland Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. [2015] NZEnvC lq \ IN THE MATTER of 6 appeals under Section 174 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) BETWEEN AND AND TRAM LEASE LIMITED (ENV -2014-AKL-000057) First Appellants SAMSON CORPORATION LIMITED AND STERLING NOMINEES LIMITED (ENV-2014-AKL-000055) Second Appellant MEDIA WORKS HOLDINGS LIMITED (ENV-2014-AKL-000058) Third Appellant STAMFORD PLAZA AUCKLAND (ENV-2014-AKL-000059) Fourth Appellant THE

10. [2024] NZEnvC 115 Anderson Branch Creek Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 440 KB]

    ...subdivision/development to the Subdivision Planner at Council. This information shall be formatted in accordance with Council’s ‘as-built’ standards and shall include all Roads (including rights of way and access lots) and Water reticulation (including private laterals and toby positions). 7 b) A digital plan showing the location of all building platforms as shown on the survey plan / Land Transfer Plan shall be submitted to the Subdivision Planner at Council. This plan...