Search Results

1. SG v UT [2023] NZDT 78 (1 March 2023) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pro...

2. OOJ v QD Inc [2023] NZDT 214 (20 June 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

3. Question, feedback or complaint

   ...it. If you complain by email, you will receive an automatic reply from the mailbox letting you know we received it, and that we’ll be in touch to confirm that we received it within 2 working days (Monday to Friday, excluding public holidays) We’ll investigate your complaint and contact you if we need more information. You should expect a response within 20 working days from the date we received your complaint. If we need more information or the matter you’ve raised is very detailed or com...

   Located in:

   1. About

4. [2014] NZEmpC 157 Howard v Carter Holt Harvey Packing Ltd [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...suspended. The letter which confirmed the suspension stated that the company was in the process of investigating an allegation that he had physically hit a temporary member of staff. He was advised that he would be contacted at the completion of the investigation process. Later that day Mr Howard telephoned Ms J McLean of the Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union. [15] On 30 July 2012, Mr Howard was advised by phone that an investigation meeting would be held on 1 August...

5. MacGregor v Craig (Rescission of Confidentiality Orders) [2016] NZHRRT 23 [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...the four proceedings to which Mr Craig, not Ms MacGregor, is a party. In her view the protection afforded by the Tribunal’s interim orders has been overtaken by those proceedings because in them Mr Craig is once more publishing confidential and private information about her for the purpose of attempting to repair his own reputation and political prospects. In those fora neither she nor the Tribunal has influence. [17] Developing this argument, Ms MacGregor pointed out, for example,...

6. FIANZ-Submission.pdf [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...steroids when preparing for attack?4 07 4.1 Police Failure to Investigate : The Police acknowledged that it is not known where the terrorist stayed on the evening of 8 Janu- ary 2019. They simply stated there is no evidence of him staying in any private or public accom- modation in or near Mayfield on 8 January. 4.2 Incomplete Investigation Our research reveals that: o There are 660 households in the Mayfield area. How many of these did the Police visit? o There are 14 propert...

7. Smith - Waiomu 3B2B2B3B2(2015) 105 Waikato Maniapoto MB 12 (105 WMN 5) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...and/or interfere with the Beynon septic tank disposal lines. [24] After the site visit all parties returned to Thames for the hearing. Evidence for the B2 trustees [25] Mr Smith’s evidence on behalf of the B2 trustees was that the trustees had investigated the possibility of gaining access from the road frontage on Waiomu Valley Road. However, the land rises from 20 metres to 80 metres within a short distance and the engineering work required to form the access was costed at $9...

8. [2006] NZEmpC AC 43/06 Axiom Rolle PRP Valuations Services Ltd v Kapadia [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...some cases that require judicial intervention; and (f) recognise that judicial intervention at the lowest level needs to be that of a specialist decision-making body that is not inhibited by strict procedural requirements; and (fa) ensure that investigations by the specialist decision-making body are, generally, concluded before any higher court exercises its jurisdiction in relation to the investigations; and (i) recognise that difficult issues of law will need to be determined by h...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 076 McDonnell v Auckland Council [pdf, 316 KB]

   ...be sufficient road reserve to accommodate, inter alia, stormwater networks and network utilities. [46] While there was some suggestion by Mr Clode in his evidence on behalf of DPML that “infrastructure” in this context “doesn’t include private drainage”16 and is limited to public infrastructure, there was no compelling argument to support such a limitation and nor do the relevant sections of the AUP differentiate between private and public infrastructure. [47] For cont...

10. Trustees of Oparau No 1 Block Trust - Oparau No 1 and Pirongia West 1 2B3D (2004) 109 Waikato MB 300 (109 W 300) [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    ...Kawhia Harbour. The Otorohanga District Council granted consent to the subdivision on 12 May 2003, subject to payment of a reserve contribution of $350.00. The consent also provides that the owner is not required to provide access by road or private road to the allotment because It has frontage on the Kawhia Harbour. A certificate of compliance with the conditions of the subdivision consent was issued by the Otorohanga District Council on 3 September 2003. Mrs Dockery gave evide...