Search Results

1. [2017] NZEmpC 161 Aslam v Transportation Auckland Corp Ltd [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...Auckland is contracted to run public transportation services in and around Auckland, including the bus service from Onehunga to the Auckland city centre for staff performance and development. It was Mr McLeod who conducted the subsequent investigation and made the decision to dismiss Mr Aslam. [8] When Mr McLeod received the complaint, he telephoned the passenger and asked him about the incident. He says that the passenger’s account on the telephone appeared to be cons...

2. [2011] NZEmpC 89 Young v Bay of Plenty DHB [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...matter so I oppose one last by the BOP DHB and ask the court to stay this order till after the case on grounds of Protective Disclosure is heard. [7] The Authority determination now challenged by Mr Young was made on papers rather than after any investigation meeting and was delivered on 12 April 2011. Mr Young claimed that his complaints arising out of a disclosure that he had made under the Protective Disclosure Act 2000 had not been resolved by the Board as his former employ...

3. LM v TT [2022] NZDT 166 (2 November 2022) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

4. KB & Ors v TC & RV [2023] NZDT 634 (25 September 2023) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

5. NX v P Ltd [2023] NZDT 212 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

6. MN v TG [2023] NZDT 141 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pro...

7. GM v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 722 (22 August 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

8. X Ltd v RU Ltd [2024] NZDT 882 (17 October 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

9. FA v HR and others [2024] NZDT 670 (20 August 2024) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...4. The issues to be determined are: a) Does FA have an action against any of the respondents in nuisance? b) If so, what sum (if any) should be awarded? Does FA have an action against any of the respondents in nuisance? 5. An action for private nuisance protects a person’s right to the use or enjoyment of an interest in land. The interference with use and enjoyment of land must be substantial and unreasonable. If the nuisance causes physical damage or loss of property, the Trib...

10. LG v HX [2024] NZT 681 (12 September 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

    ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pro...