Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 1 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

2. Directory of Official Information J-L [pdf, 836 KB]

   ...Crimes (Internally Protected Persons, United Nations and Associated Personnel, and Hostages) Act 1980 • Crimes Act 1961 • Crimes of Torture Act 1989 • Criminal Cases Review Commission Act 2019 • Criminal Disclosure Act 2008 • Criminal Investigations (Bodily Samples) Act 1995 • Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003 • Criminal Procedure Act 2011 • Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 • Criminal Records (Clean Slate) Act 2004 • Crown Orga...

3. Directory of Official Information J-L [pdf, 834 KB]

   ...Crimes (Internally Protected Persons, United Nations and Associated Personnel, and Hostages) Act 1980 • Crimes Act 1961 • Crimes of Torture Act 1989 • Criminal Cases Review Commission Act 2019 • Criminal Disclosure Act 2008 • Criminal Investigations (Bodily Samples) Act 1995 • Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003 • Criminal Procedure Act 2011 • Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 • Criminal Records (Clean Slate) Act 2004 • Crown Orga...

4. 2017 NZSSAA 041 (21 July 2017) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...be assumed, there is a medical opinion that the reduced frequency of counselling is inadequate. This reduction is due to the cost but the cost of counselling is significantly less than the cost of hospital admission. We recommend the Ministry investigate its options for increased funding of Ms XXXX’s counselling. Decision [16] We are required to apply the prescribed formula for determining the accommodation supplement to which Ms XXXX is entitled. Inevitably as a result of...

5. IY v AO LCRO 74 / 2011 & 85 / 2011 (18 June 2012) [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...Section 352 Lawyers and Conveyancers At 2006. 4 that Mr IY, and in particular Ms KZ, accepted instructions in a matter for which they were not qualified; that Mr IY and Ms KZ deliberately misled Mr AO into thinking that they would engage a private investigator to ensure that Mr AO’s ex-wife was not breaching the terms of an interim custody order; that they breached confidentiality by telling Mr AO’s sister personal information about the case; that they did not lis...

6. E41 Ahad Khan - Development Engineering - EIC - Council [pdf, 696 KB]

   ...be compromised due to the new stormwater generated as a result of the proposal. All stormwater will be collected via adequately designed stormwater infrastructure and discharged directly to sea. All new stormwater infrastructure will remain in private ownership. (c) New wastewater generated is proposed to be collected and discharged to the public wastewater network. I noted that Watercare had agreed to accept the additional flows subject to detailed design. (d) The earthworks to...

7. KC v Q Ltd [2021] NZDT 1352 (12 March 2021) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

8. NT v SQ [2023] NZDT 498 (31 October 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

9. MT v BX [2024] NZDT 85 (16 January 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pro...

10. DB Ltd v UC [2024] NZDT 449 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 222 KB]

    ...an agent is also someone who the principal has allowed to appear to others as having that authority, even if the agent does not (known as apparent authority). The scope of apparent authority is measured by the authority as it appears to others, and private limitations cannot affect the agent’s apparent authority. 7. I accept that UC did not actually authorise DM – there was an internal process to follow for incurring obligations on behalf of UC and what occurred here did not comply...