Search Results

1. KC v Q Ltd [2021] NZDT 1352 (12 March 2021) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

2. NT v SQ [2023] NZDT 498 (31 October 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

3. MT v BX [2024] NZDT 85 (16 January 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pro...

4. DB Ltd v UC [2024] NZDT 449 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...an agent is also someone who the principal has allowed to appear to others as having that authority, even if the agent does not (known as apparent authority). The scope of apparent authority is measured by the authority as it appears to others, and private limitations cannot affect the agent’s apparent authority. 7. I accept that UC did not actually authorise DM – there was an internal process to follow for incurring obligations on behalf of UC and what occurred here did not comply...

5. QH v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 891 (13 December 2024) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

6. Justice research

   ...explores the rise of scams. It draws on NZCVS data, alongside in-depth interviews with victims and key individuals from stakeholder agencies and organisations. The report provides a range of recommendations, including urging action from both government and private sectors to combat scams through a coordinated anti-scam centre, stronger data sharing, increased public awareness, and greater industry responsibility. Understanding scams and improving coordinated responses factsheet The crime of the...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Research & data

7. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Sensible Sentencing Group Trust (Application for Interim Non-Publication Orders) [2013] NZHRRT 14 [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...Trust with copies of our client’s Court documents. [18] The aggrieved person’s details nevertheless remained on the SSGT website until 20 May 2010. They were not removed until receipt of a letter from the Privacy Commissioner advising that an investigation had been commenced following the lodging of a complaint by the aggrieved person. But the SSGT again published details of the aggrieved person on its website in early April 2013 and the present proceedings before the Tribunal a...

8. LCRO 136/2023 QT v MZ (8 January 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader t...

9. LCRO 63/2024 WL v AC and TU (25 November 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader th...

10. LA-familyproceedings-steps.pdf [pdf, 513 KB]

    ...aid to resolve the matter by legal proceedings. • The hours claimed will be reduced from the guideline hours under Step 1 to reflect any efficiencies arising from the services already provided. Family Proceedings Steps – June 2018 Page 2 Private Mediation December 07 Step: Private Mediation Activity Guideline Hours Tasks normally covered by Guideline Hours Preparation for mediation up to 1.5 hours For • Taking instructions, attending the client • Identifying legal...