Search Results

1. NT & BT v HM [2024] NZDT 694 (20 September 2024) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

2. QX v HC [2025] NZDT 164 (13 May 2025) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...you do file an appeal at the same time, the rehearing application will be heard first. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proc...

3. Proactive-release-of-political-donations-consultation-materials-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...commenting on). Q2: Anonymous donations What factors do you think are most important when considering changes to anonymous donations? Q3: Anything else? Is there any other feedback you would like to provide on these proposed changes? Q4: As SFO is investigating most parties it is obvious that there needs to be more transparency. Where do donations come from? How are auctions used to “gain”,donations? Proa cti ve R ele as e Response ID ANON-VKQE-1UW6-A Submitted to Proposed...

4. Hammond v Credit Union Baywide [2015] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 265 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 6 Reference No. HRRT 027/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN KAREN MAY HAMMOND PLAINTIFF AND CREDIT UNION BAYWIDE DEFENDANT AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms KM Hammond in person supported by Ms J Gooding as McKenzie friend Mr AJ Harris and Mr GJC Ferguson for defendant DATE OF HE

5. [2018] NZEmpC 71 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [pdf, 347 KB]

   ...University of Wellington. One of them is a claim that she was constructively dismissed from her position as a senior lecturer in the Law Faculty. The other claim is that she was unjustifiably disadvantaged in her employment during the course of an investigation into complaints she had made. [2] Dr Sawyer complained about two senior members of staff in her faculty as a result of which the university arranged an investigation. It reached the point where a draft report was prepa...

6. [2022] NZREADT 24 - Complaints Assessment Committee 2103 v Sharma (14 November 2022) [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...[6] The Committee called the following witnesses. Ms Galuszewski [7] Amanda Galuszewski attended the hearing and confirms the truth of her brief of evidence dated 9 June 2022. She also confirms the truth of what she told the Authority’s investigators on 14 February 2018, 24 October 2018 and 2 July 2020. [8] Ms Galuszewski previously worked as a property manager for the management company between 2013 and December 2016. Mr Sharma owned and operated the management company....

7. CAC 10054 v Hume [2013] NZREADT 91 [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...‘pushy and blunt’ in asking about Mr Gaskin’s listing of his property at 19 Smart Terrace with Ms X; (c) On or about 1 December 2009, the defendant was subject of a verbal complaint to his employer from a member of the public selling a property privately, who alleged that the defendant had intimidated her in trying to persuade her to list the property with him; (d) In or around December 2009, the defendant failed to present an offer to a client against the direct instructions o...

8. Proactive-release-Foreign-Interference-Bill_FINAL..pdf [pdf, 594 KB]

   ...perceives as threats, covertly influencing government decision-making or electoral processes, and manipulating domestic media to amplify pro-foreign state perspectives. 11 Espionage refers to clandestine activities undertaken to collect State or private information, materials, or capability to obtain competitive advantage at the expense of New Zealand’s security, international relations, and economic prosperity. This definition is wider than the crime of espionage found in the Cr...

9. LCRO Annual Report 2012 [pdf, 965 KB]

   ...Convenyancers (NZSC) Standards Committees on complaints against lawyers and conveyancers. Part 7 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, which governs the regulatory scheme of the Act, essentially provides for the LCRO to undertake a second tier investigation into complaints where a party is dissatisfied with the first tier investigation by the Standards Committees. In that light it is necessary to not overlook that the activities of this office also reflect the activities of the Sta...

10. [2010] NZEmpC 146 Robertson v Envirowaste Services Ltd [pdf, 44 KB]

    ...insufficient evidence that it was Mr Robertson’s truck that had hit the hopper, particularly as there was no blue paint on it in the photographs taken by Mr Robertson. [23] Mr Hayes relied on Mr Robertson’s evidence that at the Authority investigation the defendant produced for the first time a computer printout of the GPS unit on the truck. Mr Robertson claimed that the unit was accurate down to about 1 or 2 metres. He claimed that the printout showed that his truck was at...