Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 106 Guardians of the Bays Inc v Wellington International Airport Ltd [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...more than one frontage may have one access across each frontage. The width of any site access shall not exceed 6 metres; and Where site access can be provided from a service lane or right of way registered in favour of the site or other private road or private right of way, no site access shall be from a street. No site access shall be sited closer to a street intersection than the following: Arterial and principal streets: 20m Collector streets: 15m Other stre...

2. [2020] NZEnvC 025 Willis Bond Capital Partners No. 3 Limited [pdf, 914 KB]

   BEFORETHEEN~RONMENTCOURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Final submissions IN THE MATTER AND BY AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 25 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of a Notice of Motion under Section 87G of the Act requesting the granting of resource consents to Willis Bond Capital Partners No. 3 Limited WILLIS BOND CAPITAL PARTNERS NO. 3 LIMITED (ENV-2019-WLG-000022) Applicant WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Consent Authority Environment Judge

3. [2012] NZEmpC 168 Service and Food Workers Union Nga Ringa Tota Inc v Sanford Ltd [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...facilitation, there is little guidance from the Act as to what is to happen. The Authority is primarily an inquisitorial adjudication body, dealing with matters of employment rights as a public forum. However, the Authority is not acting in its investigative role, with attendant powers, when conducting a facilitation, and facilitation is – with the exception of the possible public release of recommendations – a matter private to the parties. [53] Dr McAndrew identifies three...

4. LCRO 177/2021 FA v LL (14 March 2022) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader t...

5. Summit v REAA & Lewis [2011] NZREADT 38 [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...the second respondent formally engaged the licensee to find a tenant and manage the property at a commission rate of 8.5% of rent achieved. There was no discussion regarding selling the property or it being on the market. [6] However, under a private treaty dated 9 September 2010 with settlement on 17 September 2010 the property was sold to the tenant by the second respondent. Subsequently, the appellant licensee attempted to claim commission on the basis of the signed Residential...

6. Te Pairi v Whakatane District Council - Tahora 2AD2 and Omuriwaka (2011) 33 Waiariki MB 48 (33 WAR 48) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...commence on 1 April 2008. It was claimed that the current road had been rendered impassable as a consequence of the actions of the applicant. According to the Council, this had made public access to land beyond the disputed area, including other privately owned land and public reserves impossible. [12] Documentation supporting the application from the surviving trustees was subsequently filed and as a result the Court on 8 April 2008 found that it was ... not satisfied that the...

7. FT v NSC LCRO 260 / 2010 (21 October 2011) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...other lawyer with regard to Justice Harrison, to take whatever action the Society considered appropriate. 2 [5] On 28 April 2010, the Lawyers Complaints Service advised FT that the National Standards Committee had determined to commence an investigation into his conduct of its own motion pursuant to section 130(c) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006. [6] On receipt of this FT wrote directly to Justice Randerson and posed a number of questions, which were subsequently...

8. LCRO 186/2015 TL RH LTD & TL HOLDINGS LTD v QG (6 July 2018) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader tha...

9. LCRO 34/2020 KL v OP (4 August 2020) [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader th...

10. LCRO 133/2019 HM v RN (24 February 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]

    ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader th...