3089 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 6 Reference No. HRRT 027/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN KAREN MAY HAMMOND PLAINTIFF AND CREDIT UNION BAYWIDE DEFENDANT AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms KM Hammond in person supported by Ms J Gooding as McKenzie friend Mr AJ Harris and Mr GJC Ferguson for defendant DATE OF HE
...commenting on). Q2: Anonymous donations What factors do you think are most important when considering changes to anonymous donations? Q3: Anything else? Is there any other feedback you would like to provide on these proposed changes? Q4: As SFO is investigating most parties it is obvious that there needs to be more transparency. Where do donations come from? How are auctions used to “gain”,donations? Proa cti ve R ele as e Response ID ANON-VKQE-1UW6-A Submitted to Proposed...
...4 and Director of Proceedings v Brooks (Application for Final Non-Publication Orders) [2019] NZHRRT 33 3 [7] Mr A, the aggrieved person, was the consumer of health services in this matter. The case involves sensitive details about Mr A’s private health information, including his mental health and the circumstances regarding his death. [8] Mr A is deceased and, as such, it is not possible to seek his opinion on the suppression of his name and identifying details. We note that a...
...They are very conscious of not disturbing people around them, and do not want to be disturbed by others nearby. 19. In eight years at Whitianga Marina I have only had one complaint of noise. This was at 10pm one evening, and when I arrived to investigate they were packing up to go to bed and were extremely embarrassed they had caused any disruption. I have never had a noise complaint from the nearby residential properties, which I judge are closer to our marina piers than any h...
...Mr Davis representing himself initially, and also because of the way that he pleaded his claims at that time. [3] The Commissioner of Police now claims costs against Mr Davis. The Commissioner did not seek costs in respect of the Authority’s investigation, in which he was successful in defending Mr Davis’s claims. [4] Mr Child, counsel for the Commissioner, in his submissions on costs, summarises the attendances required as follows: a) case management of the files over a...
...person for income-related purposes; ... [11] The definition of income in the Act is different from the definition of income used by IRD. The Ministry definition of income includes use of assets such as a vehicle and claims for reimbursement of private expenses, as well as net profit. Deductions are not allowed by the Ministry for depreciation, entertainment, home office or vehicle use. [12] S 12(1A) states: The chief executive or any officer of the department acting with the a...
...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...
...Court [2023] NZDT 181 APPLICANT KM APPLICANT LM RESPONDENT BN The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The counter-claim is dismissed. Reasons Background 1. The parties own properties on [Road], a private road on a semi-rural subdivision in [Town]. 2. Five properties in the subdivision have a right of way over [Road]. 3. In July 2023, E Ltd carried work on the road. LM and KM submit that the work was necessary because the road w...
...not in this situation where a third party is accepting liability and is insured, NI for BD says that this is just the way the policy they have with their insurer, WF, works. He noted that as a commercial vehicle policy it operates differently from a private vehicle policy where an excess would be recoverable in these circumstances. It is unclear why a knock-for-knock agreement would work in this way, and why the ‘value’ exchanged under the knock-for-knock agreement would not be the ful...
...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pro...