Search Results

1. Complaints Assessment Committee 404 v Kumandan, Kumandan v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 404) [2018] NZREADT 51 [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...was the person with authority to execute contracts on the part of the company. The company was the vendor in the case of each of the transactions which give rise to the charges against the defendant. [8] Mr Lloyd confirmed to the Committee’s investigator that he has given the defendant authority to sign documents on his behalf, as health reasons make it difficult for him to sign documents himself. Eric Lloyd has indicated that he reviews all documents before the defendant signs...

2. Directory of Official Information 2019 J-L [pdf, 834 KB]

   ...Liability Act 1962 • Official Information Act 1982 • Ombudsmen Act 1975 • Parole Act 20028 • Perpetuities Act 1964 • Political Disabilities Removal Act 1960 • Prisoners’ and Victims’ Claims Act 2005 • Privacy Act 1993 • Private International Law (Choice of Law in Tort) Act 2017 • Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 20109 • Prohibition of Gang Insignia in Government Premises Act 2013 6 Administered jointly with the Parlia...

3. LCRO 200/2020 SK and WP v AQ (27 October 2023) [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader t...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 28 Stevens v Hapag-Lloyd (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 307 KB]

   ANGELIQUE STEVENS v HAPAG-LLOYD (NZ) LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 28 [12 March 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 28 ARC 87/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ANGELIQUE STEVENS Plaintiff AND HAPAG-LLOYD (NZ) LIMITED Defendant ARC 7/14 IN THE MATTER a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN

5. LCRO 35/2024 UX v RT (19 September 2024) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...tell her they had signed purchase agreements for two properties. [6] The vendor under Agreement A was a family trust associated with acquaintances of the couple. The friends and the trust were all named as vendors. The agreement was entered into privately; that is, not through a real estate agent. [7] Of relevance to the applicant’s view of the subsequent course of events, one of the trustees of the vendor trust was the chairperson of the body corporate for the development....

6. Appendix-19-Conditions-with-Regional-Council-feedback.pdf.pdf [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project GB-030235-390-1002-V1:AS-E VOLUME II - SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT DRAFT 1 DRAFT The base draft conditions include those as lodged with the application, as well as the amendments by Waka Kotahi dated 21 March 2023 (all shown in black). Recommended amendments the shown as deletions in strikethrough and additions underlined. Further amendments recommend in various s87F reports, in some cases nota

7. LCRO 187/2022 JP Limited v YG (6 June 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...remain on foot. • JP’s complaint related to conduct that it reasonably considered ought to be a matter of concern and interest to the Law Society as the body regulating conduct of its members. • JP should not be penalised for requesting an investigation of the conduct and the production of documentation. • The complaints related to alleged conduct which attracts a significant penalty and it was therefore necessary to evidence the breadth and complexity of the conduct co...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 198 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Knight [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...26 paragraphs from the determination, which it set out in a list but without any amplification of the issue being taken with each paragraph. Those paragraphs are ones containing findings adverse to it, such as criticisms of the process used to investigate the circumstances leading to Ms Knight’s suspension and dismissal. The only part of the pleading in paragraph [8] that might be argued as touching on her health, but only in passing, is where Carrington lists its disagreement w...

9. Director of Proceedings v IDEA Services Ltd [2022] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 690 KB]

   ...the end of your work period, or within 24 hours of the incident. 3 Complete all boxes on the front of the form… … 9 Fax or scan or email serious incidents to your Manager and then forward original to Manager. … 2.4 Reporting and Investigating Critical Events5 Any critical incident must be reported to the Services General Manager as soon as possible but no later than twelve (12) hours after the event has occurred using the Critical Event Incident Reporting Form. Critic...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 117 Hutchison v Nelson City Council re-issued [pdf, 222 KB]

    ...issues were not resolved. Later that day Mr Gully wrote to Ms Hutchison stating that NCC now had serious concerns about Ms Hutchison’s conduct, and potential breaches of her terms and conditions of employment. Advice as to allegations and the investigative procedure that would follow would be given as soon as possible. It was acknowledged that she was on sick leave and not expected to return until 21 October 2011. [36] On 17 October 2011, Ms Hutchison sent an email t...