Search Results

1. U Ltd v B Ltd (2023) NZDT 591 (14 November 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

2. KH v NK [2024] NZDT 277 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pro...

3. UI v T Ltd [2025] NZDT 11 (27 January 2025) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...do file an appeal at the same time, the rehearing application will be heard first. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the procee...

4. ET & Ors v CG & KG [2024] NZDT 861 (11 October 2024) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

5. Sixtus v Trustees of the Hokotehi Moriori Trust - Taonga Tūturu on Rēkohu (2025) 97 Te Waipounamu MB 243 (97 TWP 243) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...Pauli ship that landed here in 1843. She also says that she has whakapapa to the three waka Arawa, Kotahi-nui, and Mataatua and is of Ngāi Tupango, Te Rarawa, Te Aupouri, Ngaati Whanaunga and Ngāti Maru hapū. She goes on to say that she supports investigating the historical evidence of Catelin Waterman which shows there is a possibility of the relationship of the Moriori to the Moimoi/Bell Beaker people. Jodie Boyce filed a submission dated 8th of June 2025. Ms Boyce says that her...

6. Gisborne District Council v Hautapu – Tātarahake No 1 (2013) 27 Tairawhiti MB 295 (27 TRW 295) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...the Tātarahake No 1 Block for the following reasons:- (a) the beach reserve is used by a number of local residents for recreational activities. There is a sheltered boat launching area at this part of the beach. (b) Adjoining the reserve is a privately owned property (which also depends on the metal drive for access. On that property is a tractor shed that houses a tractor used to assist the launching and retrieve of boats from the beach. (c) The adjoining property also contains an...

7. COES - EiC - M J Sole (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 4.1 MB]

   ...been under taking archaeological surveys and assessments for Queenstown Lakes District Council, Central Otago District Council (CODC), Department of Conservation (DOC), various forestry companies; Queenstown Trails Trust/Mahu Whenua Covenant, private property developments, Clutha Gold Trail land access negotiations involving 135 land parcels 15 private land easements. 4 I have previously been employed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) as an agricultural and h...

8. OIA-109706-v2.pdf [pdf, 6.4 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 12 March 2024 Our ref: OIA 109706 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Review of child participation in Family Justice report Thank you for your request under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) on 13 February 2024 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry). Specifically, you requested: I am requesting a copy

9. [2011] NZEmpC 43 Hally Labels Ltd v Powell [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...Judgment: 13 May 2011 ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] The plaintiff has challenged the Employment Relations Authority’s refusal to grant it an interim injunction restraining the defendant from competing with it. The Authority will be investigating the substantive matter on 26 May 2011. The interim injunction is being sought to uphold a restraint contained in an employment agreement made on 11 May 2010, which contained the following clause: 9.0 Restraint on post-em...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 208 Hayne v ASG [pdf, 162 KB]

    ...or management personnel, on a confidential basis. [4] The Deputy Proctor accordingly provided the information he had heard in Court to the Proctor, the appropriate Divisional HR Manager and ASG’s immediate supervisor. It was decided that an investigation should be commenced, and this occurred on 19 June 2013. ASG was suspended for its duration. ASG was represented for those purposes by his Union, the New Zealand Tertiary Education Union (TEU). On legal advice, the TEU contende...