Search Results

1. CAC 413 v Marr [2019] NZREADT 28 - Penalty (1 July 2019) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...date of “10 working days after the date of service of the settlement notice (excluding day of service)” and a typed “contemporaneous settlement” clause as a further term of the agreements. [8] Ms Marr continued to seek mortgage finance, investigating around six possible sources, including Mr Barton. The specified settlement date of 15 August passed without settlement occurring. Ms Guttenbeil was then in breach of the auction sale contract, and increasingly concerned as to...

2. Adie v Accident Compensation Corporation [2024] NZACC 112 (9 July 2024) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...within 21 days of claim lodgement, but this may be extended to four months where additional information is required and the procedure in s 56(2)(b)(ii) and (4) is followed. “Complicated claims” under s 57 are allowed a longer period for initial investigation and subsequent extensions to obtain additional information up to a maximum of nine months from claim lodgement. [37] Section 58 deems the effect of the Corporation not complying with the time limits in s 56 or s 57 is tha...

3. [2021] NZEmpC 177 Allison v Ceres New Zealand LLC [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...Mr McIntyre wrote to Mr Allison on 19 September 2018, the letter began by stating that the company was taking the opportunity to review it business structure and future needs. It informed Mr Allison that this review was partly the result of an investigation into the work environment that recommended organisational changes be made. The second reason was to inform Mr Allison about the downturn in business. [20] In discussing the downturn in business, Mr McIntyre’s letter told Mr...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 165 Lawson v NZ Transport Agency [pdf, 463 KB]

   ...………………………………………………………. [50] Subsequent telephone conversation between Mr Lawson and Mr Henderson... [64] Conclusion of process review ……………………………………………………….. [68] Employment investigation …………………………………………………………… [69] Disclosure ……………………………………………………………………………... [81] Preparations for meeting with...

5. [2020] NZEnvC 211 Panuku Development Auckland Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...Assessment of Tattico Ltd June 2017 Environmental Effects Panuku Development Auckland Resource Marshall Day Rp 001 r10 13 June 2017 Consent - Acoustics Acoustics 2015475A Arboricultural Assessment Peers Brown 06.06.2017 Miller Ltd Geotechnical Investigation Report Tonkin & Taylor 30717.001.v5 June 2017 Ltd Preliminary Site Investigation Tonkin & Taylor 30717.001.v4 May 2016 Ltd Detailed Site Investigation Tonkin & Taylor 30717.002.v4 April 2017 Ltd Proposed Apartme...

6. AMLCFT Statutory Review Consultation Document [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   - Review of the AML/CFT Act Consultation Document Ministry of Justice October 2021 Important notice The opinions contained in this document are those of the Ministry of Justice and do not reflect official government policy. Readers are advised to seek specific legal advice from a qualified professional person before undertaking any action in reliance on the contents of this publication. The contents of this discussion document must not be con

7. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Netsafe Inc [2022] NZHRRT 15 (Removal of Certain Redactions After Appeal Period) [pdf, 511 KB]

   ...to the Tribunal that collectively they consider Mr Z’s use of the HDCA processes was another form of harassment of them by Mr Z. [22] They also stated that their own social media postings identified in the District Court civil claim are largely private Facebook postings. They expressed concern that, despite their attempts to block Mr Z from their online communications, he appeared to have been able to access their private communications. They consider this is a continuation of cyber...

8. Complaints Management Policy [pdf, 624 KB]

   Part 3 – Complaints Management Operational Policy Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information.

9. Legal Aid Complaints Management Policy [pdf, 633 KB]

   Part 3 – Complaints Management Operational Policy Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information.

10. [2011] NZEmpC 68 Army Surplus Disposals Ltd v Reed [pdf, 110 KB]

    ...determination. The challenge related to the whole of the determination and sought a full hearing of the entire matter (a hearing de novo). The determination [4] The Authority Member in her determination mentioned the following: (a) During the investigation meeting Mr Doyle had stated that Mr Reed’s employment actually ended in September 2009 after which time he was an independent contractor receiving $500 per week cash together with commission on some sales. Mr Reed had all...