Search Results

1. UI v T Ltd [2025] NZDT 11 (27 January 2025) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...do file an appeal at the same time, the rehearing application will be heard first. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the procee...

2. ET & Ors v CG & KG [2024] NZDT 861 (11 October 2024) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

3. Sixtus v Trustees of the Hokotehi Moriori Trust - Taonga Tūturu on Rēkohu (2025) 97 Te Waipounamu MB 243 (97 TWP 243) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...Pauli ship that landed here in 1843. She also says that she has whakapapa to the three waka Arawa, Kotahi-nui, and Mataatua and is of Ngāi Tupango, Te Rarawa, Te Aupouri, Ngaati Whanaunga and Ngāti Maru hapū. She goes on to say that she supports investigating the historical evidence of Catelin Waterman which shows there is a possibility of the relationship of the Moriori to the Moimoi/Bell Beaker people. Jodie Boyce filed a submission dated 8th of June 2025. Ms Boyce says that her...

4. CAC 409 v Wong [2018] NZREADT 8 [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...received a complaint made by Mr Newal Singh against Mr Ganesh and Ms Prasad-Ganesh. The complaint concerned Mr Singh’s purchase of a property in Manurewa in which Mr Ganesh and Ms Prasad- Ganesh had acted for the vendor.1 In the course of its investigation into Mr Singh’s 1 The Committee has laid a disciplinary charge against Mr Ganesh in respect of this transaction. However, that charge is not relevant to the charge against Mr...

5. E50 Myfanwy Eaves - Historic Heritage - EIC - Council [pdf, 809 KB]

   ...sub-surface historic heritage risk relates to a planning framework. It does not, however, relate to an archaeological understanding of deposition conditions in Aotearoa New Zealand nor does it reflect accepted practice regarding historic heritage investigation or recording. 8.4 Moreover it does not have consideration for unscheduled historic heritage, namely the portion of the Jellicoe Street Seawall which is summarily judged. 8.5 My understanding of the Cut/Fill plan is that it s...

6. E50 Myfanwy Eaves - Historic Heritage - EIC - Council V2 [pdf, 810 KB]

   ...sub-surface historic heritage risk relates to a planning framework. It does not, however, relate to an archaeological understanding of deposition conditions in Aotearoa New Zealand nor does it reflect accepted practice regarding historic heritage investigation or recording. 8.4 Moreover it does not have consideration for unscheduled historic heritage, namely the portion of the Jellicoe Street Seawall which is summarily judged. 8.5 My understanding of the Cut/Fill plan is that it s...

7. E50 Myfanwy Eaves Historic Heritage EIC Council [pdf, 810 KB]

   ...sub-surface historic heritage risk relates to a planning framework. It does not, however, relate to an archaeological understanding of deposition conditions in Aotearoa New Zealand nor does it reflect accepted practice regarding historic heritage investigation or recording. 8.4 Moreover it does not have consideration for unscheduled historic heritage, namely the portion of the Jellicoe Street Seawall which is summarily judged. 8.5 My understanding of the Cut/Fill plan is that it s...

8. LCRO 145/2019 TS v NU and VL (21 January 2020) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader th...

9. Audit-and-monitoring-policy [pdf, 376 KB]

   ...provides that legal privilege does not prevent, limit or affect the provider producing a file, record or document requested during audit. Information that is subject to legal professional privilege and produced for the purposes of an audit or investigation must not be used in: • any proceedings against the client; or • any way that is detrimental to the client. Reference: Sections 92 and 109 Disclosure of information The Ministry will only disclose information from any audi...

10. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Kejriwal [2022] NZLCDT 24 (20 July 2022 [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...of a practitioner. We accept that these issues are present for this practitioner. [68] She is aware that a strike-off (or suspension) will inevitably involve publication in the New Zealand Gazette but beyond that she seeks suppression of all private medical information and also of her name. [69] In the H case, the practitioner had retired from practice and therefore there was no public safety component residing in a suppression order. In this case, because of the dishonesty...