TB v NX LCRO 80 / 2011 (13 December 2012) [pdf, 134 KB]
...case, for which he considered Mr NX had done “next to nothing”. He advised that Mr NX did not have any staff available to conduct this preparation and in the end that Mr TB himself had done a lot of the work. He advised that he also engaged a private investigator and the services of another law firm to provide resource management expertise which Mr NX did not have. [12] He then says that the second invoice was for the actual trial which was set down for two weeks but in the...