Search Results

1. [2022] NZREADT 11 – BM & FM v REAA (2 June 2022) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...quality shedding divided into 6 bays, stables and a huge workshop! Extended families are well covered here with 2 quality houses (7 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms in total) or rent one out for extra income. Both houses have lockup garaging and are quite private and separate from each other. The main home is brick & tile and has double glazing. But the best thing about this property is the beautiful flat 10 acres of quality grazing land!!! [10] The agency prepared a rent appraisal (1 Novem...

2. LCRO 117/2022 VN v SC (16 May 2024) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. 1 Deliu v Hong [2012] NZHC 158, [2012] NZAR 209 at [39]–[41]. 12 The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader...

3. LCRO 121/2023 AI v HR (12 December 2023) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader t...

4. Gorgus v Corrections [2023] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 316 KB]

   ...sparring or fighting while employed in the prison laundry. In addition, on 20 May 2019 Mr Gorgus alleged that he was the victim of an unreasonable use of force and that he was unlawfully placed in segregation. [9] Whether or not Corrections’ investigations into and subsequent accounts of these incidents were properly concluded and recorded is not a matter for this Tribunal. Rather, the Tribunal can only consider the allegations of interference with Mr Gorgus’ privacy. The variou...

5. Mok v Boyd [2010] NZWHT Auckland 29 [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...elevations. Mr Medricky also noted the non-compliant minimum ground level and the cladding embedded onto the decks, cracks in the cladding and a failure to install the cladding in accordance with the standards required. At the time of his investigations Mr Medricky was not able to confirm whether or not the cladding had control joints without destructive testing. However Mr Dibley observed during the remedial work that there were none. [24] There was some discussion betw...

6. Building a return on investment capability in the Justice sector [pdf, 652 KB]

   ...of those benefits translated into dollar values. NZTA uses comprehensive cost-benefit analysis to compare transport investment options. 68. The final stage requires estimating the effect an investment has on a range of wider factors such as the private costs of security in defence against crime, the effect on unreported crime, as well as placing a dollar value on these factors. Because in most cases we have only limited data to support this kind of exercise, a desk-based project relying...

7. ENVC Matiatia expert witness planning 2014 [pdf, 700 KB]

   ...that the deck-based proposal appears to 4 Planning Joint Witness Statement 15 present a feasible alternative to a reclamation. MD advises that the parking deck is an alternative CMA based method, that alternative land based sites have been investigated and are not practicable and that the applicants will address this matter in rebuttal evidence. i. Chapter 23 - Marinas i. DS considers that the proposal fails to meet Policy 23.4.6 in relation to the appropriateness and size o...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 141 Lewis v Immigration Guru Ltd [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...writing on 3 February 2016. Mrs Lewis was not required to work out the period of notice and was paid in lieu. [6] Mrs Lewis raised a personal grievance and then commenced proceedings in the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). An investigation meeting took place on 3 October 2016. In a determination dated 13 October 2016, the Authority held:1 (a) The trial period provision in Mrs Lewis’ employment agreement was valid, and she could not succeed in her claim for un...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 209 Bettley-Stamef Partnership v Waikato District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...beyond). Economic costs Public costs associated with the proposal are minimal. Regulatory and compliance costs necessary to authorise future development of the site will be recoverable through fee collection at application and monitoring stages. Private capital will be required to subdivide and develop rural lifestyle blocks. Any requirements for the upgrade of Bettley and Yumelody lanes can be recovered through development contributions. Economic benefits Uplift in the value of the...

10. [2011] NZEmpC 109 Evolution E Business Limited v Smith [pdf, 229 KB]

    EVOLUTION E-BUSINESS LIMITED V SMITH NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 109 [26 August 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 109 ARC 15/10 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN EVOLUTION E-BUSINESS LIMITED Plaintiff AND BENJAMIN SMITH Defendant Hearing: 27 - 30 June 2011 and 1, 4 and 5 July 2011 Appearances: Mr Dean Organ and Mr Michael McFadden, advocates for the plaintiff Defendant in per