Search Results

1. G v CAC 10069 & M [2012] NZREADT 38 [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...licensee about advertising related to another property where the advertising cost $777.25 which the licensee paid for on the basis that the vendors reimburse her $380 of it. However, they withdrew their home from X Realty in November 2010 and sold it privately, but were reminded that they needed to pay the $380 to the licensee. Because they had not paid by 15 February 2011, X Realty charged the licensee for it. On 6 March 2011 she took a $380 invoice to one of those vendors at his plac...

2. Sandy v Khan LCRO 181 / 2009 (25 December 2009) - Decision on orders [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...exercising the discretion whether or not to prohibit publication. [51] The Committee also referred to Director of Proceedings v Nursing Council of New Zealand [1999] 3 NZLR 360 in which the High Court was considering the basis upon which presumptively private proceedings against a nurse should be open to the public. It was observed in that case (at p 383 / 384) that public accountability was an important consideration which must be taken into account when considering such matters....

3. Family Court rewrite submission: Save the Children [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...that the Family Court has ignored or minimised family violence, violence against children and or against the mother14 of their children, and these practices continue to happen as shared through Frances’s Story and voices of women shared through the Backbone Collective Reports15. We believe a full investigation should be undertaken to ascertain, 1 – the extent to which this is taking place, 2 - establish processes that hold professionals to account who fail to act on knowledge of fam...

4. [2021] NZREADT 02 - Anonymised Appellant (18 January 2021) [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...Agents Authority [2016] NZHC 1804, at [128]; and Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [200p] 1 NZLR 1, at [97]. [e] ordering the licensee to pay the complainant any costs or expenses incurred in respect of the inquiry, investigation, or hearing (s 93(1)(i)). [16] Section 110A (1) and (2) of the Act are also relevant: 110A Costs (1) In any proceedings under this Act, the Disciplinary Tribunal may make any award as to costs that it thinks fit, whether or n...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 028 Goodwin v Wellington City Council [pdf, 990 KB]

   ...not guarantee on-street parking especially in the city centre, and vans associated with the proposed activities must not park or wait in taxi stands or bus stops. 6. The access road from Aston Fitchett Drive to the drop off and pick up points is a private Right of Way (ROW). The consent holder will be required to make annual contributions towards the maintenance and improvements of this ROW. 7. An occupancy agreement is required from the Council's Parks Sport and Recreation Team,...

6. [2021] NZREADT 41 - London v Cartwright (3 August 2021) [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...Hannah’s affidavit is unsworn, so does not assist the Tribunal. Discussion [33] Mr Cartwright was provided with a copy of the complainants’ complaint. Following the Committee’s decision to inquire into the complaint the Authority’s investigator wrote to him on 20 April 2020, noting the issues raised in the complaint as being: 1. The licensee’s selling practice was deceptive in promoting the property as having a July 2019 move in date. 2. The licensee continued to...

7. [2023] NZEnvC 102 The Alpine Group Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 8.1 MB]

   ...orders. On the information provided to the court, I am satisfied that the orders will promote the purpose of the Act so I will make the orders sought. PA Steven Environment Judge AUTH-20211565 ~ APPENDIX 1 Cnr North Road and Price Street (Private Bag 90116 DXYX20175) lnvercargill environment SOUTHLAND Telephone (03) 211 5115 Fax No. (03) 211 5252 Southland Freephone No. 0800 76 88 45 REGIONAL COUNCIL Te Taiao Tonga Coastal Permit Under Section 104B of the Reso...

8. Brunton v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 217 [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...to the Corporation on Ms Brunton’s behalf on 23 December 2020 by Dr John Aiken. Cover was sought for “complications/medical surgical care”, in the context of an “unusual reaction following endoscopy”. [14] The Corporation’s initial investigation included contact with Ms Brunton on 5 February 2021. The initial client contact summary was recorded. [15] The Corporation applied its treatment injury cover decision tool assessment, which noted the documents referred to, but id...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 093 Ocean Dynamics Limited v Tauranga City Council [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...Assessment of Environmental Effects Report prepared Lysaght and titled ‘Proposed Development for TMH (1982) Limited’, dated 14 November 2022. (b) Flood hazard assessment prepared by Lysaght dated 2 November 2022, reference 225222. (c) Geotechnical investigation report prepared by CMW Geosciences dated 3 May 2022, reference TGA2022-0051AB Rev 1. (d) Contaminated site management plan prepared by Pennan & Co titled ‘105 Birch Avenue, Judea, Tauranga’, dated 26 August 2022....

10. Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora [2025] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 424 KB]

    ...for review. 25. The DHB also informed HDC that the postoperative information sheet provided to the aggrieved person advised to seek help for moderate to severe pain. However, the postoperative information provided by the DHB to HDC during its investigation did not state this recommendation. No follow-up appointment scheduled 26. The aggrieved person did not receive a follow-up postoperative appointment. 27. It was intended for the aggrieved person to be reviewed one week after...