Search Results

1. LCRO 40/2023 DG v [Area] Standards Committee [X] (13 March 2024) [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader tha...

2. ENVC Matiatia party corresp joint memo WML AT 20150703 [pdf, 719 KB]

   ...time. 3. Council Access to the Site The servants or agents of the Auckland Council (Council hereafter) shall be permitted to have access to relevant parts of the site at all reasonable times for the purpose of carrying out inspections, surveys, investigations, tests, measurements and/or to take samples. 4. Monitoring The consent holder shall pay the Council an initial consent compliance monitoring charge of $3000.00 (inclusive of GST), plus any further monitoring charge or charges to r...

3. ENVC Matiatia party corresp RPMay15 coastal permit draft conditions [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...time. 3. Council Access to the Site The servants or agents of the Auckland Council (Council hereafter) shall be permitted to have access to relevant parts of the site at all reasonable times for the purpose of carrying out inspections, surveys, investigations, tests, measurements and/or to take samples. 4. Monitoring The consent holder shall pay the Council an initial consent compliance monitoring charge of $3000.00 (inclusive of GST), plus any further monitoring charge or charges t...

4. LCRO 20/2017 AP v RE (20 December 2018) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader t...

5. LCRO 133/2017 AD v BE (18 September 2019) [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader t...

6. [2016] NZEmpC 20 Roy v Board of Trustees of Tamaki College [pdf, 522 KB]

   CHRISTOPHER SCOTT ROY v BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TAMAKI COLLEGE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 20 [14 March 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 20 ARC 92/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CHRISTOPHER SCOTT ROY Plaintiff AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TAMAKI COLLEGE Defendant Hearing: 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 July, and 30 September 2015 (Heard at Auckland)

7. Restorative Justice: Best practice in New Zealand 2004 - 2017 [pdf, 428 KB]

   ...the process is discontinued. The privacy and confidentiality of participants must be protected and respected to the extent possible Personal information (for example, a victim’s contact details or an offender’s criminal history) is always private to the individuals concerned and must not be disclosed without their consent.14 Information about what occurred during the restorative justice process may be disclosed to non-participants but only with participants’ consent. Facilita...

8. Burrows & Anor v CAC20002 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 17 [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...mortgagee sale and that they originally agreed to the auction course but changed their mind after speaking with Mr Robertson. Mr Corbett then states “when the instruction to sell reverted from the proposed auction to a joint sole agency selling by private treaty, it was a clear understanding between the agencies and the Burrows that the standard best practice whereby the selling agent was paid the commission was confirmed.” [46] He also stated that, as the contract for sale and purc...

9. ZA v YB LCRO 164/2013 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...costs decision quashed by the High Court on judicial review in and that attachments 3 and 4 were emails between Mr [ZA] and this Office relating to that review process. As that review did not involve Mr [YB], and the LCRO must conduct reviews in private pursuant to s 206(1) of the Act, this Office did not provide copies of those materials to Mr [YB]. Mr [YB] was reminded that he had until 29 June 2016 in which to respond, or to indicate that he did not intend to respond, to Mr [ZA]’s...

10. ZA v YB LCRO 23/2014 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...costs decision quashed by the High Court on judicial review in and that attachments 3 and 4 were emails between Mr [ZA] and this Office relating to that review process. As that review did not involve Mr [YB], and the LCRO must conduct reviews in private pursuant to s 206(1) of the Act, this Office did not provide copies of those materials to Mr [YB]. Mr [YB] was reminded that he had until 29 June 2016 in which to respond, or to indicate that he did not intend to respond, to Mr [ZA]’s...